<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.39 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘百法明門論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837) › 2.39

# 大乘百法明門論疏 2.39

大乘百法明門論疏 2.39

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.39)

第二、釋妨難者，問曰：「何故《瑜伽》、《顯揚》、此論並同？何故《對法論》有二十三，無不和合？此有何意？」

> Second, resolving objections: Question: "Why do the \*Yogācārabhūmi\*, the \*Prakaraṇāryavācā\*, and this treatise agree, while the \*Abhidharmasamuccaya\* has twenty-three, lacking disharmony? What is the intention behind this?"  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.38](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.38)
- [Next: 2.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.40)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837~en-mt.2.39) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.39) · Pramāṇa
