<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.8 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘百法明門論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837) › 2.8

# 大乘百法明門論疏 2.8

大乘百法明門論疏 2.8

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.8)

問曰：「欲與勝解，五根不攝，何故《瑜伽》建立此二入隨煩惱？若爾，何故遍行五數亦不入隨煩惱中？」

> Question: "Chanda and adhimokṣa are not subsumed under the five faculties; why does the Yogācārabhūmi establish these two as entering into the upakleśas? If so, why do the five sarvatraga factors also not enter into the upakleśas?"  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.7)
- [Next: 2.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.9)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837~en-mt.2.8) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.8) · Pramāṇa
