[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [因明入正理論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840) › 1.18 # 因明入正理論疏 1.18 因明入正理論疏 1.18 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.18) 三問：「量立、量破可名因明，過破、似破應非因明。」答：「是因明類故，或似真俱因明，名略已攝故。」 > Third question: "Valid proof and valid refutation may be called hetuvidyā; faulty refutation and fallacious refutation should not be hetuvidyā." Answer: "Because they belong to the class of hetuvidyā; or because both the fallacious and the true are hetuvidyā, the abbreviated name having already subsumed them." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.17) - [Next: 1.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.19) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840~en-mt.1.18) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.18) · Pramāṇa