[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [因明入正理論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840) › 1.19 # 因明入正理論疏 1.19 因明入正理論疏 1.19 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.19) 四問：「立、破有言智，可是因明。現、比無智言，應非因明。」答：「見因亦明，見因證明，自證亦因，故皆因明。」 > Fourth question: "Proof and refutation possess verbal cognition, so they may be hetuvidyā. Direct perception (pratyakṣa) and inference (anumāna) have no verbal cognition, so they should not be hetuvidyā." Answer: "Observing a reason is also an illumination; observing a reason verifies an illumination; self-verification is also a reason; therefore, all are hetuvidyā." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.18) - [Next: 1.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.20) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840~en-mt.1.19) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.19) · Pramāṇa