[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [因明入正理論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840) › 1.42 # 因明入正理論疏 1.42 因明入正理論疏 1.42 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.42) 似能立中，且九似宗，陳那菩薩《理門》等論立有五種，不說後四，謂能所別、俱不極成、相符極成。以《理門》說宗等多言說能立，此中唯取隨自意樂為所立，說名宗，非彼相違義能遣。後之四種既非相違，所以略之。天主宗過，不但相違，故申九種。 > Among the semblances of valid proof (sādhanābhāsa), regarding the nine semblances of the proposition (pakṣābhāsa): In treatises such as the Nyāyamukha, Bodhisattva Diṅnāga established five kinds and did not mention the latter four, namely: the unestablished predicate (viśeṣaṇāsiddha), the unestablished subject (viśeṣyāsiddha), both being unestablished (ubhayāsiddha), and established by consensus (siddhasādhana). This is because the Nyāyamukha states that the proposition and so forth are multiple statements called valid proof, and herein one only takes what is intended by oneself as the thesis to be proved, which is called the proposition, provided it is not subverted by an incompatible meaning. Since the latter four are not incompatible, they were omitted. The Master Śaṅkarasvāmin's faults of the proposition are not only incompatibilities; hence he sets forth nine kinds. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.41) - [Next: 1.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.43) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840~en-mt.1.42) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.42) · Pramāṇa