<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.45 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [因明入正理論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840) › 1.45

# 因明入正理論疏 1.45

因明入正理論疏 1.45

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.45)

若此上三不立過者，所依非極，便更須成。宗既非真，何名所立？

> If these three above were not established as faults, the substrata not being thoroughly established would require further proof. Since the proposition is not genuine, how could it be called that which is to be proved?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.44)
- [Next: 1.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.46)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840~en-mt.1.45) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.45) · Pramāṇa
