[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [因明入正理論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840) › 1.46 # 因明入正理論疏 1.46 因明入正理論疏 1.46 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.46) 相符極成者，若以相符本非宗故，依何立過？兩俱不成，及俱不成，并俱不遣，本非因、喻，依何立過？若以因、喻有所申述何非過者；宗亦有說，如何非過？是故加之。但陳那影略說，天主委具陳之，非是師資自為矛盾。 > As for established by consensus: if one argues that because consensus is originally not a proposition, on what basis could a fault be established? Both unestablished in both, unestablished in both \[factors\], and both unexcluded are originally not reasons or examples; on what basis are faults established \[for them\]? If one argues that because the reason and example have put forward an assertion, how could it not be a fault? The proposition also has an assertion; how could it not be a fault? Therefore it is added. Diṅnāga merely spoke implicitly and concisely, whereas Śaṅkarasvāmin set it out comprehensively and in detail; it is not that master and disciple contradict each other. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.45) - [Next: 1.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.47) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840~en-mt.1.46) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.1.46) · Pramāṇa