[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [因明入正理論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840) › 2.34 # 因明入正理論疏 2.34 因明入正理論疏 2.34 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.34) 彼復又言：「若有於此一分已成，隨說一分亦成能立。」謂於二喻，有已解同，應但說異；有已解異，應但說同。不具說二，亦成能立。 > He further stated: "If for someone one part is already established, stating whichever one part also constitutes a proof." This means that regarding the two examples, for someone who already understands similarity, one should only state dissimilarity; for someone who already understands dissimilarity, one should only state similarity. Even without stating both fully, it also constitutes a proof. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.33) - [Next: 2.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.35) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840~en-mt.2.34) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.34) · Pramāṇa