[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [因明入正理論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840) › 2.35 # 因明入正理論疏 2.35 因明入正理論疏 2.35 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.35) 彼論又言：「若如其聲，兩義同許，俱不須說，或由義准，一能顯二。」聲謂有法，所作性因，依此聲有。若敵證等聞此宗、因，如其聲上兩義同許，即解因上二喻之義，同異二喻俱不須說。或立論者已說一喻，義准顯二，敵證生解，但為說一。此上意說：二俱不說，或隨說一，或二具說，隨對時機一切皆得。 > That treatise also says: 'If, as in the case of sound, both meanings are mutually accepted, neither need be stated; or, through implication, one can reveal both.' 'Sound' refers to the subject (dharmin), and the reason (hetu) of being produced exists based on this sound. If the opponent and the witness, upon hearing this thesis and reason, mutually accept both meanings upon sound, they will immediately understand the meaning of the two examples on the reason, and neither the affirmative nor the negative example need be stated. Alternatively, if the proponent has already stated one example, and by implication it reveals both so that the opponent and the witness give rise to understanding, one states only one. The meaning of the above is: not stating either, or stating either one, or stating both completely—all are acceptable according to the capacity of the audience at the time. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.34) - [Next: 2.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.36) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840~en-mt.2.35) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.35) · Pramāṇa