[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [因明入正理論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840) › 2.45 # 因明入正理論疏 2.45 因明入正理論疏 2.45 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.45) 問：「敵者不解聲有無常，何得以瓶而為同品？」答：「兩家共許，所作同故，因正同品。立者所立本立無常，故舉於瓶為宗同品，亦無過也。」 > Question: 'The opponent does not understand that sound possesses impermanence; how can a pot be taken as a sapakṣa?' Answer: 'Because both parties mutually accept that they are the same in being produced, it is the primary sapakṣa of the reason. What the proponent seeks to establish is originally impermanence; therefore, adducing a pot as the sapakṣa of the thesis is also without fault.' > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.44) - [Next: 2.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.46) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840~en-mt.2.45) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.2.45) · Pramāṇa