[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [因明入正理論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840) › 3.44 # 因明入正理論疏 3.44 因明入正理論疏 3.44 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.3.44) 問：「如聲論言：聲應非聲作有緣性，所作性故，如瓶等。亦應說是有法差別相違。」答：「彼自違宗，故非彼過。本亦不諍聲非作聲有緣性故，彼似破攝。如非聲有緣性，如是應非擊發所生起等，皆准此知。」 > Question: 'Just as the Grammarian says: "Sound should not act as an object of cognitive apprehension of sound; because of being produced; like a pot and so forth"—should this also be called contradictory to the qualification of the subject?' Answer: 'They themselves contradict their own thesis, so it is not that fault. Originally there was also no dispute that sound does not act as an object of cognitive apprehension of sound; so this is subsumed under pseudo-refutation (dūṣaṇābhāsa). Just as with not being an object of cognitive apprehension of sound, so too with "ought not to be produced by striking," and so forth—all should be understood according to this.' > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.3.43) - [Next: 3.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.3.45) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840~en-mt.3.44) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.3.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1840.3.44) · Pramāṇa