[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘起信論別記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1845) › 1.147 # 大乘起信論別記 1.147 大乘起信論別記 1.147 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.147](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1845.1.147) 問：《瑜伽論》說「諸心心法，同一所緣，不同一行相，一時俱有，一一而轉。」而此中說知相亦同，如是相違，云何和會？答：二義俱有，故不相違。何者？如我見是見性行，我愛是愛性行，如是等別，各不同行。而見愛等，皆作我緣，約此義邊，名知相同。故知此二爾，不相妨也。 > Question: The Yogācārabhūmiśāstra states, "All minds and mental factors share the same object of condition, but do not share the same mode of activity; they are simultaneous, yet each operates individually." Yet here it is said that the cognitive characteristic is also the same. These being contradictory, how are they reconciled? Answer: Both meanings are present, so there is no contradiction. Why? For instance, self-view operates in the nature of seeing, while self-love operates in the nature of attachment. Distinct in this way, each has a different operation. Yet seeing, love, and the rest all take the self as their condition. In respect of this aspect, it is called "sameness of cognitive characteristic." Therefore we know that these two are simply so and do not obstruct each other. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.146](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1845.1.146) - [Next: 1.148](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1845.1.148) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1845.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1845~en-mt.1.147) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [大乘起信論內義略探記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1849.1.53) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1845.1.147](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1845.1.147) · Pramāṇa