[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘起信論義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1846) › 2.116 # 大乘起信論義記 2.116 大乘起信論義記 2.116 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.116](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1846.2.116) 問：覺異相等亦不覺後，為何不亦立不覺之名？答：若據覺前不覺後亦得名不覺，故下文乃至十地皆不覺。若得覺業不覺惑，正名為不覺，即此文也。以覺與惑正酬對故，非於業也。 > Question: Since one who awakens to the mark of difference and so forth also does not awaken to what follows, why is the name 'non-enlightenment' not established for them as well? Answer: If based on awakening to what precedes while not awakening to what follows, they could also be called 'non-enlightenment'; hence the text below says that even up to the tenth ground, all are non-enlightenment. But if it is in terms of awakening to karma while not awakening to afflictions, it is properly named 'non-enlightenment', which is this text. This is because awakening and affliction properly correspond to each other, not \[awakening and\] karma. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.115](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1846.2.115) - [Next: 2.117](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1846.2.117) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1846.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1846~en-mt.2.116) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1846.2.116](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1846.2.116) · Pramāṇa