[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [起信論疏筆削記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848) › 11.36 # 起信論疏筆削記 11.36 起信論疏筆削記 11.36 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [11.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.11.36) 淨相即智淨不思議業及後二鏡，已見前文，下文即熏習中文。然則前三細六麁雖是染相，以約不覺義說，故不引用。今別引下文者，意證此染是真如相，故文云：真如之法實無有染，但以無明而熏習故則有染相。若前九相，初標、後結，皆約不覺，不言皆是真如相故，由是疏文引用雅當。 > The pure marks are the purity of wisdom, inconceivable karma, and the latter two mirrors, as seen in the previous text; the text below is in the section on vāsanā. However, although the preceding three subtle and six coarse marks are defiled marks, because they are spoken of in terms of the meaning of non-enlightenment, they are not cited here. Now separately citing the text below is intended to verify that this defilement is the mark of tathatā; therefore the text says: 'The dharma of tathatā is truly without defilement, but only through the perfuming of ignorance is there the mark of defilement.' As for the preceding nine marks, their initial designation and final conclusion are both stated in terms of non-enlightenment, not saying that all are marks of tathatā; for this reason, the commentary's citation is completely fitting. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 11.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.11.35) - [Next: 11.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.11.37) - [Up: 11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.11) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848~en-mt.11.36) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.11.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.11.36) · Pramāṇa