<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.12.53 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [起信論疏筆削記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848) › 12.53

# 起信論疏筆削記 12.53

起信論疏筆削記 12.53

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [12.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.12.53)

論　即心下，二、釋，疏二：初、約王數釋，論二：初、顯無別異。疏　即此等者，心是真心，由動故成不覺，不覺與覺一體無異，故云即也。尚無覺不覺異，豈有王數耶？

> \[Regarding\] the text of the treatise, "that the mind itself", and so on: second, the explanation. The commentary has two parts: first, explaining in terms of \[mind-\]king and \[mental\] concomitants. The treatise has two parts: first, demonstrating the absence of difference. \[Regarding\] the commentary's "precisely this", and so on: "mind" is the true mind; due to movement, it becomes non-enlightenment. Non-enlightenment and enlightenment are of one essence without difference; hence it says "itself" \[or "precisely"\]. When there is not even a difference between enlightenment and non-enlightenment, how could there be \[mind-\]king and \[mental\] concomitants?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 12.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.12.52)
- [Next: 12.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.12.54)
- [Up: 12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.12)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848~en-mt.12.53) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.12.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.12.53) · Pramāṇa
