[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [起信論疏筆削記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848) › 15.28 # 起信論疏筆削記 15.28 起信論疏筆削記 15.28 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [15.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.15.28) 疏　答此約下，十四、因果無性同源答。意云：所言從行生者，但以本覺隨流成染，始覺反流成淨，故有行致之說。如其剋就真心，則與佛體竟無有異，此則因果迷悟悉無差別。今疏一向約始覺同本覺顯無差別者，以果例因也。 > \[Commentary\] 'Answer: This is explained in terms of ...' \[marks\] the fourteenth: the reply that cause and result lack an intrinsic nature and share the same source. The idea is: what is said about being 'born from practice' merely means that because original enlightenment follows the flow and becomes defiled, and actualized enlightenment reverses the flow and becomes pure, there is the teaching that practice brings it about. If one strictly examines the true mind, it has no difference whatsoever from the Buddha's essence; thus cause and result, delusion and awakening, are completely without distinction. Here the commentary consistently explains that actualized enlightenment is identical with original enlightenment to demonstrate non-distinction, taking the result to illustrate the cause. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 15.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.15.27) - [Next: 15.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.15.29) - [Up: 15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.15) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848~en-mt.15.28) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.15.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.15.28) · Pramāṇa