[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [起信論疏筆削記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848) › 17.2 # 起信論疏筆削記 17.2 起信論疏筆削記 17.2 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [17.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.17.2) 一、問。論　上說下，引前所說以為義宗，即前云：所言覺義者，謂心體離念。離念相者，等虛空界，無所不遍，法界一相等。又真如門及真如體相中具說。何故下，對以成難，意云：眾生真如即同佛體，但念真如，便可得道，何用別更修諸行耶？斯乃但可只用直心，不合更說後二。 > First, the question. The treatise: "It was said above, etc.": It cites what was spoken earlier to serve as the doctrinal basis. That is, it was said before: "The meaning of enlightenment is that the mind's essence is free from conceptual thought. The mark of freedom from thought is equal to the realm of empty space, with nothing it does not pervade, the single mark of the dharmadhātu," and so on. It was also fully explained in the Gate of Tathatā and in the essence and attributes of tathatā. From "Why, then..." below, it confronts this to form a challenge, meaning: sentient beings' tathatā is identical to the Buddha's essence; merely contemplating tathatā, one should then attain the Way—why would one need additionally to cultivate various practices? This implies that one should only use the straightforward mind and that it is improper further to speak of the latter two. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 17.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.17.1) - [Next: 17.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.17.3) - [Up: 17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.17) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848~en-mt.17.2) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.17.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.17.2) · Pramāṇa