[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [起信論疏筆削記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848) › 3.10 # 起信論疏筆削記 3.10 起信論疏筆削記 3.10 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.3.10) 後義者，即不覺也。依此不覺起業等相，此三屬本識位，對後事識六麁，名之為細。故論云：復次依不覺故生三種相，與彼不覺相應不離等。業相者，約動作為因，二義得名。故論云：一者無明業相。以依不覺故心動，說名為業，覺則不動，動則有苦，果不離因故。轉相者，前之業相轉至此位，為能見故。故論云：二者能見相。以依動故能見，不動則無見。現相者，以依能緣之心，帶起所緣之境。故論云：三者境界相。以依能見故，境界妄現，離見則無境界。注自體等者，以唯識說有漏識自體生時轉似二分：似能緣相名為見分，似所緣相名為相分。雖文異而義同，故今注配。自體即自證分也。 > The "latter meaning" is precisely non-enlightenment. Relying on this non-enlightenment, the mark of karma, etc., arise. These three belong to the stage of the root consciousness; in contrast to the six coarse marks of the subsequent phenomenal consciousness, they are called subtle. Hence the treatise says: "Furthermore, relying on non-enlightenment, three kinds of marks are produced, which are associated with and not separate from that non-enlightenment," etc. "Mark of karma": taking movement as the cause, it acquires its name from two meanings. Hence the treatise says: "First is the mark of karmic avidyā: because relying on non-enlightenment the mind moves, it is called karma. Enlightened, it does not move; moving, there is suffering, because the effect is not separate from the cause." "Mark of turning": the former mark of karma turns to reach this stage, becoming that which can see. Hence the treatise says: "Second is the mark of that which can see: because relying on movement it can see; not moving, there is no seeing." "Mark of manifestation": because relying on the cognizing mind, it brings forth the cognized object. Hence the treatise says: "Third is the mark of objective realms: because relying on that which can see, objective realms falsely manifest; apart from seeing, there are no objective realms." The note "self-substance...": because Consciousness-Only states that when the self-substance of defiled consciousness arises, it transforms to resemble two divisions: resembling that which cognizes is named the vision division; resembling that which is cognized is named the image division. Although the texts differ, the meaning is the same; hence the note correlates them now. The "self-substance" is precisely the self-verifying division. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.3.9) - [Next: 3.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.3.11) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848~en-mt.3.10) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.3.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.3.10) · Pramāṇa