[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [起信論疏筆削記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848) › 6.46 # 起信論疏筆削記 6.46 起信論疏筆削記 6.46 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.6.46) 疏　問二門下，二、通難，二：今初、二門示義通局難。初句指定前義。何故下，引文正難。意云：真如既攝生滅門，何不同彼示三大？生滅既攝真如門，何不同彼示一大？示義既差，攝法須別；攝法若等，示義應同。如何攝法即同，示義却別耶？ > \[On the Commentary's\] "Question: Below the two gates..." Second, resolving objections. There are two \[parts\]: now, first is the objection regarding the pervasion or restriction of the demonstrated meanings across the two gates. The first sentence specifies the preceding meaning. \[On\] "For what reason..." below, he quotes the text to raise the formal objection. The meaning is: Since tathatā subsumes the gate of arising and ceasing, why does it not, like that \[other gate\], demonstrate the three greatnesses? Since arising and ceasing subsumes the gate of tathatā, why does it not, like that \[other gate\], demonstrate the one greatness? If the demonstrated meanings are different, the subsumed phenomena must be distinct; if the subsumed phenomena are equal, the demonstrated meanings should be identical. How can it be that the subsumed phenomena are identical, yet the demonstrated meanings are different? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.6.45) - [Next: 6.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.6.47) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848~en-mt.6.46) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.6.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1848.6.46) · Pramāṇa