<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1849.1.54 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘起信論內義略探記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1849) › 1.54

# 大乘起信論內義略探記 1.54

大乘起信論內義略探記 1.54

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1849.1.54)

問：多爾，何故《瑜伽》云「阿賴耶識五數相應」。答：今此論約煩惱別，名為相應；能見心染，無煩惱數，名不相應。雖微細遍行五數心與法，通達無相而取相故。是通法執，而無計慧數之見，是故無別法執也。

> Question: If so, why does the Yogācārabhūmi say that the ālayavijñāna is associated with the five mental factors? Answer: Now, this treatise defines "associated" in terms of distinct afflictions; the defilement of the mind capable of seeing lacks affliction factors, so it is called unassociated. Although the subtle, omnipresent five mental factors and dharmas penetrate signlessness yet grasp signs, this is generic grasping of dharmas, yet it lacks the view of the factor of calculating intelligence; therefore there is no distinct grasping of dharmas.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1849.1.53)
- [Next: 1.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1849.1.55)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1849.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1849~en-mt.1.54) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1849.1.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1849.1.54) · Pramāṇa
