[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘義章](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851) › 1.85 # 大乘義章 1.85 大乘義章 1.85 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.85](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1.85) 問曰：《成實》亦說名字依四大生，何故彼宗不說因生以為正義？釋言：有以。彼《成實》中宣說四大和合生聲，是聲和合方得成名，疎挾一重，是故因生不名正義。《地持》等中，宣說名字親依想生，故說因生以為正義，不類譬斯。 > Question: The Tattvasiddhi also says that names arise depending on the four great elements; why does its school not say that born of causes is the primary meaning? Explanation: There is a reason. That Tattvasiddhi explains that the four great elements combine to produce sound, and only with the combination of sound can a name be formed; there is an intervening layer of separation, and therefore born of causes is not called the primary meaning. In the Bodhisattvabhūmi and others, it is explained that names arise directly depending on conception, and therefore they say that born of causes is the primary meaning; this cannot be compared as an analog to that. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.84](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1.84) - [Next: 1.86](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1.86) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851~en-mt.1.85) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1.85](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1.85) · Pramāṇa