<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1.86 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘義章](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851) › 1.86

# 大乘義章 1.86

大乘義章 1.86

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.86](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1.86)

問曰：何故法假之中四假皆正，名、受二中有正有傍？釋言：法通四俱是正，名、受局故，有正有傍。

> Question: Why is it that within the provisionality of dharmas all four provisionalities are primary, whereas within the two of names and reception there are primary and secondary? Explanation: Dharmas are pervasive, so all four are primary; names and reception are restricted, and therefore have primary and secondary.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.85](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1.85)
- [Next: 1.87](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1.87)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851~en-mt.1.86) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1.86](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1851.1.86) · Pramāṇa
