<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.72 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [二諦義](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854) › 2.72

# 二諦義 2.72

二諦義 2.72

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.72)

問：俗諦中有四句，真諦中亦有四句不？解云：真諦但有兩句，一者是真是諦、二者是真非諦。是真是諦，此可知，真必是諦也。言是真非諦者，隨真說故是真，非情謂之實故非諦，如前隨俗諦說非俗諦，今亦爾也。

> Question: There are four propositions in conventional truth; are there also four propositions in ultimate truth? Explanation: In ultimate truth there are only two propositions: first, it is both ultimate and a truth; second, it is ultimate and not a truth. That it is both ultimate and a truth can be known, for the ultimate must be a truth. As for saying 'it is ultimate and not a truth', because it is spoken in accordance with the ultimate it is ultimate, but because it is not the real of sentimental conception it is not a truth—just as previously what was spoken in accordance with conventional truth was not conventional truth, so it is here as well.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.71)
- [Next: 2.73](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.73)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854~en-mt.2.72) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.72) · Pramāṇa
