<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.8 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [二諦義](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854) › 2.8

# 二諦義 2.8

二諦義 2.8

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.8)

問：若爾，從來解那得云有於諦教諦耶？解云：於兩情名二於諦；佛為眾生說此二於，即是教諦。更無有二，但約義判。何者？於諦即是所、教諦即是能，能所判於教二諦也。

> Question: If so, how could previous explanations say that there are the truth from perspective and the truth as teaching? Explanation: From the perspective of the two sentiments, they are called the two truths from perspective; the Buddha preaching these two perspectives for sentient beings is precisely the truth as teaching. There are no other two \[truths\]; they are distinguished only in terms of meaning. Why? The truth from perspective is the object, and the truth as teaching is the agent; the two truths of perspective and teaching are distinguished in terms of agent and object.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.7)
- [Next: 2.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.9)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854~en-mt.2.8) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1854.2.8) · Pramāṇa
