[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [肇論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1858) › 1.36 # 肇論 1.36 肇論 1.36 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1858.1.36) 難曰：論云「言用則異，言寂則同。」未詳般若之內，則有用寂之異乎？ > The questioner asks: The treatise says, 'Spoken of in terms of function, they are different; spoken of in terms of quiescence, they are identical.' It is not yet clear whether within prajñā itself there is a difference between function and quiescence? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1858.1.35) - [Next: 1.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1858.1.37) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1858.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1858~en-mt.1.36) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [宗鏡錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.2016.36.61) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1858.1.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1858.1.36) · Pramāṇa