[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [肇論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1859) › 1.85 # 肇論疏 1.85 肇論疏 1.85 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.85](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1859.1.85) 第二、解釋經意也。邪見見無，若謂物定是無，則邪見應非是惑乎？謂物有則耶常見為得者，常見見有，若謂物定是有，則常見應非是惑乎？以物非無故下，覆上句可見也。然則非有非無信真諦之談者，非有非無是真諦教也。 > Second, explaining the intention of the scriptures. Wrong view views \[things as\] non-existent; if one says things are determinately non-existent, then should wrong view not be a delusion? As for 'If one says that things are existent, then eternalist views would be correct,' eternalist view views \[things as\] existent; if one says things are determinately existent, then should eternalist view not be a delusion? 'Because things are not non-existent' and so on reviews the clauses above, as can be seen. 'Thus, neither existent nor non-existent is truly the discourse of paramārtha-satya': neither existent nor non-existent is the teaching of paramārtha-satya. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.84](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1859.1.84) - [Next: 1.86](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1859.1.86) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1859.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1859~en-mt.1.85) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1859.1.85](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1859.1.85) · Pramāṇa