[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [肇論新疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860) › 1.94 # 肇論新疏 1.94 肇論新疏 1.94 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.94](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.1.94) 雙引經論立不遷之宗也。《道行》引其正文，卷當第十。諸法即物也。本謂根本，亦元也。緣集而來，來何所從？緣離而去，去何所至？如善財問慈氏云：「此樓閣何處去耶？」答曰：「來處去也。」解云：欲明其去，先知其來。來不見源，去亦何所？譬如寒暑相代，寒自何來？暑於何去？是謂諸法如幻如化，當處出生隨處滅盡。中觀下但義引彼破去來品，卷當第二。然論極深細，今略示之。方謂去處。彼即去者，論長行云「去法、去者、去處，是法皆相因待，不得言定有定無，是故決定知三法虛妄、空無所有，但有假名、如幻如化。」此論之意隨俗故知彼去，順真故不至方。 > This cites both sūtra and treatise to establish the thesis of immutability. The \*Daoxing\* quotes the primary text, in what corresponds to chapter ten. 'All dharmas' are things. 'Originally' means fundamental, and also origin. Arriving through the concurrence of conditions, from where does arrival come? Departing through the dispersal of conditions, to where does departing go? As when Sudhana asked Maitreya: 'Where did this tower go?' He replied: 'It went to the place from which it came.' The explanation says: to clarify its going, first know its coming. If coming has no seen source, where could going be? For example, like winter and summer succeeding each other: whence does winter come? Whither does summer go? This is called all dharmas being like an illusion and like a phantom, arising right where they are and perishing as they go. From 'the \*Mūlamadhyamakakārikā\*' downward, it merely draws the meaning from its chapter refuting going and coming, corresponding to chapter two. However, the treatise is extremely profound and subtle; now it is briefly shown. 'Direction' refers to the destination of going. 'He' refers to the goer. The prose commentary of the treatise says: 'The act of going, the goer, and the destination—these dharmas are all mutually dependent; one cannot say they definitely exist or definitely do not exist. Therefore one decisively knows that the three dharmas are false and completely empty of existence, having only provisional names, like an illusion and like a phantom.' The meaning of this treatise is: according with the conventional, one knows that he goes; conforming to the true, he does not reach the direction. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.93](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.1.93) - [Next: 1.95](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.1.95) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860~en-mt.1.94) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.1.94](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.1.94) · Pramāṇa