<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.152 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [肇論新疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860) › 2.152

# 肇論新疏 2.152

肇論新疏 2.152

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.152](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.152)

初二句明不取，後二句顯非知。真智觀真，若取所知，豈成真智？故永嘉大師云：「若以知知寂，此非無緣知。如手執如意，非無如意手。」若此則能所宛然，不唯不成於真智，亦不能證寂。問：若竟無知，何名般若？亦應不名見道？答：

> The first two phrases clarify non-grasping; the latter two phrases reveal non-knowing. When true wisdom contemplates the true, if it grasps a known, how could it become true wisdom? Thus Great Master Yongjia said: "If one knows serenity with knowing, this is not unconditioned knowing; just as a hand holding a wish-fulfilling jewel is not a hand devoid of a jewel." If it were like this, then subject and object would be blatantly distinct; not only would it fail to accomplish true wisdom, but it could also not realize serenity. Question: If in the end there is no knowing, why is it called prajñā? Should it also not be called seeing the path? Answer:  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.151](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.151)
- [Next: 2.153](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.153)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860~en-mt.2.152) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.152](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.152) · Pramāṇa
