[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [肇論新疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860) › 2.30 # 肇論新疏 2.30 肇論新疏 2.30 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.30) 略引二經，以示此論之所宗。《放光》即《大品》也，但兩譯成異。二十卷云：「般若無所有相。」第十五云：「須菩提！般若波羅蜜不生不滅相。」《道行》第一云：「般若波羅蜜當何從說？菩薩都不可得見亦不可知。」無所有相者，謂有無知見等相皆離故。無生滅相者，非因緣所生故。亦四相不遷、三際莫易。餘如下釋。 > He briefly cites two sūtras to demonstrate what this treatise takes as its doctrinal basis. The Fangguang is the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā, differing only through two translations. Fascicle 20 says: "Prajñā has no mark of possessing anything." Fascicle 15 says: "Subhūti! The prajñāpāramitā has the mark of neither arising nor ceasing." Fascicle 1 of the Daoxing says: "From what should the prajñāpāramitā be expounded? The bodhisattva can neither be seen nor known at all." "Having no mark of possessing anything" means that marks such as being, non-being, knowing, and seeing are all departed from. "Having no mark of arising and ceasing" means that it is not produced by causes and conditions. Furthermore, the four characteristics do not shift, and the three periods of time do not change. The rest is explained below. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.29) - [Next: 2.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.31) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860~en-mt.2.30) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.30) · Pramāṇa