[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [肇論新疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860) › 2.322 # 肇論新疏 2.322 肇論新疏 2.322 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.322](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.322) 自疏云至者矣，即前劉公就敘論旨之言。以此下三句，許其所得無差。復何足下，責其迷昧復求心異。通斯意云：既知聖心冥寂、有無一致，自可外忘權實之異名、內得聖心之無異，中心印定，不復求異可也。何故復以人情分別之心，而求聖心權實兩異乎？ > From "Your letter states" to "always been confused" is the quotation of Liu Yimin's earlier words summarizing the treatise's purport. The three sentences from "Cherishing this" downward affirm that what he attained was without error. From "how could it be necessary" downward, he rebukes him for his confusion in seeking differences in the mind once more. The general sense is: since you already know that the sage mind is dark and quiescent, and that being and non-being are consistent, you can naturally forget the different names of expedient and real externally, and internally attain the non-difference of the sage mind, with your mind deeply sealed and settled, no longer seeking differences. Why then rely once more on the discriminating mind of human sentiment to seek two separate differences—expedient and real—in the sage mind? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.321](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.321) - [Next: 2.323](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.323) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860~en-mt.2.322) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.322](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1860.2.322) · Pramāṇa