大乘法苑義林章 7.11
大乘法苑義林章 7.11
- Language
- Classical Chinese
7.11.1
第四因起果相者,《攝大乘》等說一種因。 彼論第六卷說「入所知相云何應見? 多聞熏習,所依非阿賴耶識所攝」等。 又云「由何能入? 由善根力所任持故。 乃至廣說,多聞熏習是出世心種子性故。 」此說最初修四勝行:一親近善士以為勝緣、二聽聞正法、三如理思惟、四如說修行。 後三內行,內行要先多聞熏習,其小聞者無容得故。 此多聞種,《成唯識》等略有三釋:一唯新熏,唯有漏種以為因緣親生無漏。 《唯識論》中雖已廣破,依《瑜伽論》五十二「問:若諸習氣攝一切種子,復名遍行麁重者,諸出世間法從何種子生? 若言麁重自性種子為種子生,不應道理。 」故知有漏非無漏法親生因緣。 二唯本有,諸無漏種未發心前名性種姓,發心已後名習種姓,熏習彼用令漸增故。 見道以前有漏聞熏能生現行,無漏未起,雙取此二名順解脫、決擇分善。 故《雜集》說「決擇分善雖修道斷,然得建立為無漏性道諦所攝。 見道以後無漏種子方生現行,第八地前二種雜起,成佛以後諸有漏善及因無漏竝皆轉滅,諸果無漏圓滿生起。 故《涅槃》說『捨無常色獲得常色,受、想、行、識亦復如是。 』」今觀彼義,唯舊種子生現,都無現行更新熏種子。 《唯識論》中亦已廣破。 三者種子皆有二種,本有、新熏。 見道以前同第二說,見道以後諸無漏種本有生現行,新諸現行復熏成新種。 略有二義:一者轉滅、二者轉齊。 轉滅義者,如大乘位無始以來加行勝善、無漏善種,未逢緣故皆唯下品。 見道以前有漏聞熏為勝緣故,資下無漏種漸令增勝,至見道位生下現行,現行復熏下品種子,見道修習以為緣故。 至修道位,前剎那中見道下種滅,修道中種生生中現行,現行復熏中品種子,修道修習以為緣故。 至究竟位,前剎那中中品無漏種滅,後剎那中上品無漏種生,無所依故、道已滿故,更不熏習。 本唯一品,劣滅勝生,故名轉滅。 後修習故,前之同類不能為同類因引後同類果故,如是地地下中上品諸無漏種,及諸位中加行勝善下中上品諸有漏種,皆應准知。 至佛位中,唯有無漏上品圓滿,無漏中下、一切有漏竝皆捨滅,故經說捨無常色等。 二者轉齊,法爾種子皆有三品:初修下故,至見道位,下品無漏種生現行,現行復熏下品種子,若無修習任運下生。 由修習故至修道位,中品種子生中現行,現行復熏中品種子,前之下品亦轉成中,若不熏習任運中生。 由修習故至佛位中,上品種子生上現行,道已滿故、無所熏故,更不熏習。 中品種子竝轉成上,前中下種不復相續,與後勝齊,故名轉齊,故經說言捨無常色等。 望自同品可名轉滅,言轉齊名者望他異品。 此多聞熏種,見道以前,有漏種子親為因緣生諸現行,現行為因緣復熏成種。 望無漏種餘出世法,為增上緣,由無漏種所資持故。 諸有漏種感勝異熟,不造無間業、不墮惡趣等。 由有漏法資無漏故,當生出世無漏現行。 見道以後,無漏種子親為因緣生無漏現行,與有漏法為增上緣,令有漏善感十王果。 諸有漏善資助無漏,展轉增明證離繫法,乃至成佛,有漏皆滅純無漏在,諸有受生皆依示現。 此聞熏習,見道以前,聞似法義理智法已,數起思惟,乃至四善根中等引修習。 至見道位,能證智起熏發種子,所生現智所現相好,為受用身因,所證理明為法身因。 故《勝鬘》說「於無量煩惱藏所纏如來藏不疑惑者,於出無量煩惱藏所纏如來法身亦無疑惑。 」修二因故,復得二身。 化身但由大悲熏煮,修前二因願力所起。 《金光明》說是第一身依應身顯,是第二身依法身顯,法身無依說是如如、如如智故。 大菩提心以善根為自體,善根即是大菩提性。 《智度論》說「智及智處皆名般若。 」〈菩薩地〉說「菩提、菩提斷俱名為菩提,其諸善根即是多聞熏習種故。 」《涅槃》等經說「有二種因:一生因,如芽生莖;
Fourth, regarding the marks of the fruit arising from the cause: The Mahāyānasaṃgraha and others state one kind of cause. Fascicle six of that treatise states: 'How should entry into the marks of the knowable be seen? Through the perfuming of extensive hearing, whose basis is not subsumed under the ālayavijñāna,' and so forth. It also says: 'By what is one able to enter? By being sustained by the power of roots of goodness,' and so on at length, 'because the perfuming of extensive hearing is of the nature of seeds of the supramundane mind.' This refers to initially cultivating the four superior practices: 1. associating with virtuous friends as the superior condition, 2. hearing the correct Dharma, 3. proper reflection, and 4. practicing as taught. The latter three are internal practices; internal practices must be preceded by the perfuming of extensive hearing, for one of little hearing cannot possibly obtain them. Regarding this seed of extensive hearing, the Cheng weishi lun and other texts have briefly three explanations: 1. Solely newly perfumed: only sāsrava seeds act as the direct cause to directly produce the anāsrava. Although this has been extensively refuted in the Weishi lun, it relies on Yogācārabhūmi, fascicle 52: 'Question: If all impressions subsume all seeds and are further called universally active heavy defilements, from what seeds do supramundane dharmas arise? If one says that they arise taking the seed of the nature of heavy defilements as their seed, that is unreasonable.' Thus it is known that the sāsrava is not the direct cause that directly produces anāsrava dharmas. 2. Solely originally existent: all anāsrava seeds before generating the [bodhi] resolve are called the natural lineage, and after generating the resolve are called the acquired lineage, because perfuming their function causes them to gradually increase. Before the path of seeing, sāsrava hearing and perfuming can produce active manifestations while the anāsrava has not yet arisen; taking these two together is called the roots of goodness conducive to liberation and to definitive penetration. Therefore the Abhidharmasamuccaya-vyākhyā says: 'Although the roots of goodness conducive to definitive penetration are abandoned in the path of cultivation, they are nevertheless established as being subsumed under the truth of the path of anāsrava nature.' Only after the path of seeing do the anāsrava seeds generate active manifestations; before the eighth bhūmi the two kinds arise mixed together; after attaining Buddhahood, all sāsrava wholesome dharmas and the causal anāsrava are both transformed and eliminated, and the fruitional anāsrava arises in perfection. Thus the Nirvāṇa-sūtra says: 'Relinquishing impermanent form, one attains permanent form; feeling, perception, karmic formations, and consciousness are also like this.' Now observing that position, only old seeds produce active manifestations, and active manifestations do not newly perfume seeds at all. This has also been extensively refuted in the Weishi lun. 3. Seeds are of both kinds: originally existent and newly perfumed. Prior to the path of seeing it is the same as the second explanation; after the path of seeing, originally existent anāsrava seeds generate active manifestations, and new active manifestations in turn perfume into new seeds. There are briefly two meanings: the first is transformation through extinction, and the second is transformation into equivalence. As for the meaning of transformation through extinction: just as in the stages of the Mahāyāna from beginningless time, the superior wholesome and anāsrava wholesome seeds of preparation, not having met the conditions, are all only of the lower grade. Prior to the path of seeing, with the sāsrava hearing and perfuming as the superior condition, the lower anāsrava seeds are assisted and gradually caused to increase, reaching the stage of the path of seeing to produce lower active manifestations, which active manifestations in turn perfume lower-grade seeds, with the cultivation of the path of seeing serving as the condition. Reaching the stage of the path of cultivation, in the preceding moment the lower seeds of the path of seeing cease, and the middle seeds of the path of cultivation arise and generate middle active manifestations, which active manifestations in turn perfume middle-grade seeds, with the cultivation of the path of cultivation serving as the condition. Reaching the ultimate stage, in the preceding moment the middle-grade anāsrava seeds cease, and in the subsequent moment the upper-grade anāsrava seeds arise; having no basis [for further perfuming] and the path being perfected, they are no longer perfumed. Originally being of only one grade, the inferior ceases and the superior arises; hence it is called transformation through extinction. Because of subsequent cultivation, the preceding of the same category cannot serve as a cause of the same category to induce a subsequent fruit of the same category; thus, the lower, middle, and upper-grade anāsrava seeds of each successive bhūmi, as well as the lower, middle, and upper-grade sāsrava seeds of superior preparation in each stage, should all be understood accordingly. Reaching the Buddha stage, there is only the perfected upper grade of the anāsrava; the middle and lower anāsrava and all sāsrava are entirely abandoned and ceased, which is why the sūtra speaks of relinquishing impermanent form and so on. As for transformation into equivalence: by nature, seeds all have three grades. Because one initially cultivates the lower, upon reaching the path of seeing, the lower-grade anāsrava seeds produce active manifestations, which in turn perfume lower-grade seeds; without cultivation, they would spontaneously produce the lower. Because of cultivation, upon reaching the path of cultivation, the middle-grade seeds produce middle active manifestations, which in turn perfume middle-grade seeds, and the preceding lower grade is also transformed into the middle; if not cultivated, they would spontaneously produce the middle. Because of cultivation, upon reaching the Buddha stage, the upper-grade seeds produce upper active manifestations; because the path is already perfected and there is nothing to be perfumed, they are no longer perfumed. The middle-grade seeds are all transformed into the upper grade, and the preceding middle and lower seeds no longer continue, becoming equivalent to the subsequent superior; hence it is called transformation into equivalence, which is why the sūtra says that one relinquishes impermanent form and so on. From the viewpoint of its own category, it can be called transformation through extinction; the term 'transformation into equivalence' is used from the viewpoint of other, different categories. Regarding this seed of hearing and perfuming: prior to the path of seeing, sāsrava seeds act directly as the direct cause to produce active manifestations, and active manifestations act as the direct cause to perfume and form seeds in turn. Toward anāsrava seeds and other supramundane dharmas, they serve as the sovereign condition, being sustained by anāsrava seeds. The various sāsrava seeds induce superior karmic maturation, not creating uninterrupted karma, not falling into evil destinies, and so forth. Because sāsrava dharmas assist the anāsrava, supramundane anāsrava active manifestations will arise. After the path of seeing, anāsrava seeds directly serve as the direct cause to produce anāsrava active manifestations, and serve as the sovereign condition for sāsrava dharmas, causing sāsrava goodness to induce the fruit of the ten kings. The various sāsrava wholesome dharmas assist the anāsrava, mutually increasing in clarity to realize the dharma of disjunction, up until the attainment of Buddhahood, where the sāsrava is entirely eliminated and the purely anāsrava remains, with any taking of rebirth relying solely on manifestation. Regarding this perfuming of hearing: prior to the path of seeing, after hearing the Dharma of cognitive wisdom concerning the principles and meanings resembling the Dharma, one repeatedly gives rise to reflection, up to cultivating within equipoise in the four roots of goodness. Reaching the stage of the path of seeing, the realizing cognition arises and perfumes and activates seeds; the active cognition produced and the physical marks manifested serve as the cause of the enjoyment body, and the clarity of the realized principle serves as the cause of the Dharma body. Therefore, the Śrīmālā[-sūtra] says: 'Those who do not doubt the tathāgatagarbha enveloped by the store of immeasurable kleśas also do not doubt the Tathāgata's Dharma body emerged from the envelope of the store of immeasurable kleśas.' Because two causes are cultivated, two bodies are further obtained. The transformation body is generated solely by the perfuming and cooking of great compassion and the power of vows cultivating the preceding two causes. The Suvarṇaprabhāsa says that the first body is manifested relying on the saṃbhogakāya, and the second body is manifested relying on the dharmakāya; because the dharmakāya is without reliance, it is stated to be tathatā and the cognition of tathatā. The great bodhicitta takes roots of goodness as its essence; roots of goodness are precisely the nature of great bodhi. The Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa says: 'Both cognition and the locus of cognition are called prajñā.' The 'Bodhisattvabhūmi' says: 'Both bodhi and the abandonment of bodhi are called bodhi; those roots of goodness are precisely the seeds of the perfuming of extensive hearing.' Sūtras such as the Nirvāṇa state: 'There are two kinds of causes: first, the generating cause, like a sprout producing a stem;'
7.11.2
二了因,猶燈照物。 」《般若經》言「一切諸佛法皆從此經出,一切諸佛從此經生。 」天親論釋言「於實為了因,亦為餘生因,唯獨諸佛法,福成第一體。 」菩提名法身,體實無為。 持經及說二為了因,真如法身證因得故,非生因生。 餘謂受報相好莊嚴佛、化身相好佛,於此為生因,生因生故。 雖十法行皆能為因,受持自利、演說利他,據十行勝,略不說餘。 持經及說,唯說為因、能持,及說二種善根,正為因故。 生因有二:一正、二助。 有漏持、說,望受用身,為疎助因,性相違故。 無漏持說為佛正因,無漏相順,親生起故。 即二生因通現及種。 了因亦爾,一正,二助。 無漏智中無分別智,望自性身為正了因。 諸有漏智及後得智為助了因,非諸種子,不聞緣故。 此說一因能得二果,望自同類而為生因,望他異類而為了因。 其化身者,亦生因生。 此中法身,見道以前煩惱纏位名如來藏,二乘雖得生空真如,智障未除,非德依止,不名法身。 由數聽聞思惟修習悲智因故,初地以上二障漸斷,為德依止,即名法身。 如前所引《般若經》說,於初地中得平等身,乃至十地得妙智身,世尊自說是法身故。 由證彼理能證之智十德差別,顯彼所證法身亦十。 乃至成佛二障皆盡,二智圓成功德滿故,所證理身明淨顯現更無差別,都名法身亦自性身。 如空除翳明淨豁然,非新有空。 法身亦爾,是名法身了因成佛。 即見道前,由數聽聞思惟修習大智因故,令無漏種勢力增長。 初地以上能生現行諸無漏智,則此諸智分位差別名為十地。 故《攝論》云「法無我智,分位名地。 」此後菩薩略有二類,有怖煩惱便析伏彼令皆不行,從初地後受變易身,《楞伽經》依此分十地菩薩為三種意生身。 有從七地將滿心中方受變易,《勝鬘經》依此說二乘無學、得自在菩薩為三種意生身,七地以前不怖惑故。 如〈二種生死義林〉中說。 所證真理既名十法身,能證功德亦名十受用,受用法樂故。 然昔異生造十王業,初地以後受十王果。 第八、五識所變身形有漏異熟,相好、神通皆漸具足。 後得依此更變殊勝為相好身,是無漏攝。 生諸淨土莊嚴道場,於一身處為二類變,其相相似見者冥一,合名受用。 怖煩惱者,於見道後生廣果天,資現身因轉受變易; 不怖惑者,七地滿心方生廣果,資現身業轉成變易,如《成唯識》具說此義。 十地受用,准其所證應有十名,同法身名,理亦無爽,依能證德顯法身故。 或十地名即是十地受用身名,依彼菩薩立彼名故。 如是十地展轉殊勝,至第十地將成佛時,淨居天上乃有大寶蓮華相現,如十阿僧祇百千三千大千世界微塵數量,菩薩坐之而成正覺。 金剛心位猶有有漏、劣無漏身,解脫道生有漏都盡、劣無漏滅,故經說捨無常色等。 四智圓成功德具足,八識無漏所變色身亦皆無漏,智如其境充遍法界。 功德色身皆亦如是,相續湛然窮未來際,利生本願盡法界故,名自受用身生因所生成佛之相,見道以前大悲熏煮以為因故。 為其十地下類菩薩,現他受用身,唯是後得無漏所變。 展轉勝大,乃至成佛能遍十方,隨其所宜為十地眾,積漸轉大現他受用身。 初地見佛坐百葉花,即是稱可百大千界。 且阿彌陀佛眼如四大海水,眉間豪相如五須彌山,身高六十萬億那由他恒河沙由旬,應是初地菩薩所見,二地見佛坐千葉花,乃至十地所見轉大。 此他受用雖有父母亦現受生,不先處天方下成佛。 《鼓音王經》說「阿彌陀佛,父名月上,母名殊勝妙顏。 子名月明,奉事弟子名無垢稱,魔王名無勝,調達名寂。 」《無量壽論》云「女人及根缺、二乘種不生。 」既是報土,無實女人,佛及菩薩化為母等。 化分段身故現此相,化變易身未見誠說。 《法花經》中說「大迦葉當成佛時,無有魔事。 魔及魔人皆護佛法。 」尚有此相,況報土中有實魔事?
[and] second, the revealing cause (vyaktikāraṇa), like a lamp illuminating an object." The Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra says, "All teachings of the buddhas emerge from this sūtra; all buddhas are born from this sūtra." Vasubandhu's commentary explains: "For the true, it is the revealing cause; it is also the producing cause for the rest. For the teachings of all buddhas alone, merit accomplishes their foremost substance." Bodhi is called the Dharma body; its substance is truly unconditioned. Upholding the sūtra and expounding it are both revealing causes, because the Dharma body of tathatā is obtained through realization as its cause and is not produced by a producing cause. The "rest" refers to the Buddha of the rewarded body adorned with major marks and minor signs and the Buddha of the transformation body with major marks and minor signs; toward these it is a producing cause, because they are produced by a producing cause. Although the ten dharmic practices are all capable of acting as causes, upholding [the sūtra] benefits oneself and expounding it benefits others; based on the preeminence of these two among the ten practices, the rest are omitted in this brief account. As for "upholding the sūtra and expounding it," it is said solely to be the cause because the two kinds of roots of good—being able to uphold and being able to expound—are precisely the cause. Producing causes are of two kinds: first, direct, and second, auxiliary. Upholding and expounding that are sāsrava are distant, auxiliary causes with respect to the enjoyment body, because their natures are contradictory. Upholding and expounding that are anāsrava are direct causes of a buddha, because being anāsrava they are concordant and directly bring it about. Thus, these two producing causes apply to both actual manifestations and seeds. Revealing causes are also like this: first, direct, and second, auxiliary. Among the anāsrava wisdoms, the non-conceptual wisdom is the direct revealing cause with respect to the svabhāvakāya. The various sāsrava wisdoms and the subsequently attained wisdom are auxiliary revealing causes; they are not the seeds, because they are not the heard conditions. This explains how a single cause can obtain two fruits: with respect to its own similar kind it is a producing cause, and with respect to an other, dissimilar kind it is a revealing cause. As for the transformation body, it is also produced by a producing cause. Herein, as for the Dharma body, before the path of seeing, during the stage of entanglement by kleśas, it is called the tathāgatagarbha. Although the two vehicles attain the tathatā of the emptiness of persons, because their cognitive hindrances are not eliminated it does not serve as the support of [buddha] virtues, and is not called the Dharma body. By repeatedly listening, reflecting on, and practicing the causes of compassion and wisdom, from the first bhūmi upward the two hindrances are gradually severed, and serving as the support of virtues it is then called the Dharma body. As stated in the Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra cited previously, on the first bhūmi one attains the equal body, up to the tenth bhūmi where one attains the wondrous-knowledge body, because the World-Honoured One himself explained that these are the Dharma body. Through the ten distinct virtues of the wisdom that realizes that principle, the realized Dharma body is also shown to be tenfold. Up until one attains buddhahood, the two hindrances are completely exhausted, the two wisdoms are fully perfected, and the virtues are complete; therefore, the realized principle-body is manifested in clear purity without any difference, and is uniformly called the Dharma body as well as the svabhāvakāya. Just as when a cataract is removed from the sky and it becomes clear, open, and pure, the sky is not newly created—the Dharma body is also like this. This is called attaining buddhahood through the Dharma body's revealing cause. That is to say, before the path of seeing, by repeatedly listening, reflecting on, and practicing the causes of great wisdom, one causes the strength of the anāsrava seeds to increase. From the first bhūmi upward, they can generate the actual manifestations of the various anāsrava wisdoms; these position-distinctions of these wisdoms are then called the ten bhūmis. Therefore the Mahāyānasaṃgraha says, "The states of the wisdom of the selflessness of dharmas are called bhūmis." After this, bodhisattvas are broadly of two types: there are those who, dreading kleśas, immediately suppress and subdue them so that none arise, receiving from after the first bhūmi onward a body of inconceivable transformation—based on this, the Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra divides the bodhisattvas of the ten bhūmis into three kinds of mind-made bodies. There are also those who only receive transformation upon approaching the culmination of the seventh bhūmi—based on this, the Śrīmālā-sūtra says that the non-learners of the two vehicles and the bodhisattvas who have attained mastery constitute the three kinds of mind-made bodies, because before the seventh bhūmi they do not dread defilements. This is as explained in the "Essay on the Meaning of the Two Kinds of Samsāra." Since the true principle realized is called the ten Dharma bodies, the virtues that realize it are also called the ten enjoyments, because they enjoy the joy of the Dharma. However, in the past as ordinary beings they created the karma of ten kings, so after the first bhūmi they receive the fruit of ten kings. The bodily form transformed by the eighth and the five consciousnesses is sāsrava vipāka, gradually completing the major marks and supernatural powers. Relying on this, the subsequently attained [wisdom] transforms a still more excellent body with marks and signs, which is subsumed under the anāsrava. They are born in various pure lands and adorn the places of awakening (bodhimaṇḍa); at the location of a single body there are two types of transformations, whose appearances resemble each other and to the observer merge into one, collectively named enjoyment. Those who dread kleśas, after the path of seeing, are born in the Bṛhatphala heaven, using the cause of their present body to transition into receiving transformation; those who do not dread defilements are born in the Bṛhatphala heaven only upon the culmination of the seventh bhūmi, using the karma of their present body to transition into transformation, as this meaning is explained in full in the Cheng weishi lun. The enjoyments of the ten bhūmis, in accordance with what is realized, should have ten names; for them to share the names of the Dharma bodies is also completely reasonable, because the Dharma body is revealed in reliance upon the virtues that realize it. Alternatively, the names of the ten bhūmis are precisely the names of the enjoyment bodies of the ten bhūmis, because those names are established in reliance upon those bodhisattvas. In this way, across the ten bhūmis they become progressively more excellent, until when reaching the tenth bhūmi and about to attain buddhahood, an appearance of a great jeweled lotus flower appears above the Śuddhāvāsa heavens, of a quantity like the dust motes of ten asaṃkhyeya hundreds of thousands of trichiliocosms, upon which the bodhisattva sits and attains correct awakening. At the diamond-like mind stage, there is still a sāsrava and an inferior anāsrava body; when the path of liberation arises, the sāsrava is completely exhausted and the inferior anāsrava is extinguished, which is why the sūtra speaks of abandoning impermanent form and so on. The four wisdoms are fully perfected, virtues are complete, and the form bodies transformed by the anāsrava of the eight consciousnesses are also all anāsrava; wisdom, conforming to its object, pervades the Dharmadhātu. The meritorious form bodies are also all like this, continuous and serene, exhausting the limits of the future; because their original vows to benefit sentient beings exhaust the Dharmadhātu, this is called the mark of attaining buddhahood produced by the producing cause of the self-enjoyment body, having had the great compassion before the path of seeing as its fermenting cause. For the sake of lower-grade bodhisattvas on the ten bhūmis, [the Buddha] manifests the other-enjoyment body, which is transformed solely by the subsequently attained anāsrava [wisdom]. Progressively superior and larger, up to buddhahood it can pervade the ten directions, manifesting the other-enjoyment body to gradually increase in size according to what is appropriate for the assemblies on the ten bhūmis. On the first bhūmi they see the Buddha sitting on a flower of a hundred petals, which corresponds to a hundred great chiliocosms. Furthermore, Amitābha Buddha's eyes are like the waters of the four great oceans, the white curl mark between his eyebrows is like five Mount Sumerus, and his body's height is sixty trillion nayutas of Ganges sands of yojanas—this must be what the bodhisattvas of the first bhūmi see; on the second bhūmi they see the Buddha sitting on a flower of a thousand petals, and so on up to the tenth bhūmi where what is seen becomes ever larger. Although this other-enjoyment [body] has parents and also manifests receiving birth, it does not first reside in heaven before descending to attain buddhahood. The Sūtra on the King of Drum Sound says, "Amitābha Buddha's father was named Candra-uttara, his mother was named Utpalavarṇā (Shusheng Miaoyan), his son was named Candrabhāsa, the disciple who attended him was named Vimalakīrti, the māra king was named Aparājita, and Devadatta was named Śānta." The Treatise on the Sūtra of Immeasurable Life says, "Women, those with deficient faculties, and those of the two vehicle lineages are not born [there]." Since it is a rewarded land, there are no actual women; buddhas and bodhisattvas transform into mothers and so forth. Because it transforms a body of lifespan-delimited samsāra (pariccheda), it manifests this appearance; regarding the transformation of a body of inconceivable transformation, I have not seen any authoritative statement. The Lotus Sūtra says, "When Mahākāśyapa is to become a buddha, there will be no deeds of Māra; Māra and Māra's minions will all protect the Buddha's Dharma." If there is even this appearance, how could there be real deeds of Māra in a rewarded land?
7.11.3
然大菩薩化為魔王,障他受用,時現有之。 《觀音授記經》說「阿彌陀佛壽命無量百千萬億劫,當有終極。 滅度之後,觀世音菩薩明相出時於七寶菩提樹下成等正覺,名普光功德山王佛,國名眾寶普集莊嚴,勝阿彌陀佛國百千萬億不可為比。 此佛滅已,大勢至成佛,名善住功德寶王佛。 」十地機宜先已淳熟,故化彼類即身成佛,不說先住何處何天後來補處,即以此身就座成佛,是他受用大悲所熏生因所生成佛之相。 故平等智,初地以後能隨眾生所樂示現,由見道前大悲熏煮,初地以後能隨三乘隨所宜見現種種身。 《花嚴經》說「十住之中,初發心住能現正覺,後入涅槃。 」況十地中不現化相。 《法花》等說觀音、妙音,皆以神力,應以三乘而得度者,便現彼身而為說法,故於十地位皆能現化身。 此變化身及他受用,後得所變,本唯無漏。 五八識品依之所變皆唯有漏。 同處相似。 見者似一。 乃至成佛。 能隨十方三乘所宜現種種化。 或現佛身、或現餘身。 先菩薩位要先住彼覩史多天,後方下生。 劫初成位生婆羅門家,如慈氏等,由賤富貴、重淨行故; 劫後減位生剎帝利家,如能寂等,由賤淨行、重富貴故。 佛為化彼,現二受生。 《攝大乘論》第九卷說「佛變化身能現八相,天宮現沒、受生、受欲、踰城出家、修諸苦行、證大菩提、轉大法輪、入大涅槃。 」《大般若經》五百六十八亦說八相:一從天沒,即入胎相; 二嬰兒,即受生相; 三童子,即受欲相; 四苦行; 五成道; 六降魔; 七轉法輪; 八入涅槃。 無彼《攝論》出家之相,加降魔相。 《攝論》降魔,成道相攝。 成道離三魔,降魔伏一故,亦成道已即降魔故。 初現出家,後得苦行,離之別立。 彼論出家示厭俗相,苦行示修邪行相故。 經依出家為修苦行,故合建立; 行道證果、降魔除怨,故離別立。 各據一義,亦不相違。 廣如彼經說,明現相所以。 《花嚴經》中說有十相,八中加二。 三乘有情根猶未熟,令深欣樂方現佛身,故先處天下生成佛,由諸眾生所應見故。 是變化身,大悲熏煮生因所生成佛之相。 教說菩薩種類有三:一一生所繫,如彌勒等。 先處人中身,名一生所繫。 望當佛位,應有四生:人天本有及二中有,如七生等名一大生。 若住天中稱一生繫,半生名一,一本有故。 《智度論》說彌勒三生,說在人中,除成佛身,故說三也。 二最後身、三坐道場,此二局在成佛身位。 化身既示二受用身,雖不見文,准此應悉。 自受用身,七地以前名一生繫,八地以後名最後身,更無生故。 處蓮花座,名坐道場。 他受用身,如觀音前身名一生所繫,觀音之身名最後身。 處七寶座名坐道場,法身無生便無是義。 然此三身非定一異,自受用身為自身相。 法身即是此身理性,理智深妙非餘所知,三乘見麁立名變化,十地見細名他受用身,由見不同性相殊異。 德義聚集分成三身,非如有情各別自體立為三種,無定異故、非不異故,非定一異。 如能寂佛,十地所見名他受用身,二乘所見名變化身,無分別智觀其真理即名法身。 真智深微久修因滿自受法樂,非餘所知,名自受身。 知見不同非定一異,是生了因,因起果相。 然有一果,二因所得:一生因、二引因。 《成唯識》說「生近正果名曰生因,引遠殘果名曰引因。 如受用身,金剛定前諸無漏種遠為引因,自位種子近為生因。 望佛法身,近、遠現智俱為引因,非為生因。 不說牽引生起因等得離繫故,但說引發定異因等得無為故。 於化身等現在前位,種為生因,正生起故。 望舍利等名為引因,引殘果故。 」今說受用一果二因,若望法身一果一因,若望化身一因二果。 又佛二果二因所得,謂理、智因。 《勝鬘經》說「有二種如來藏空智,若離若脫若斷若異一切煩惱藏、不離不脫不斷不異不思議如來藏。
However, great bodhisattvas transforming themselves into demon kings to obstruct others' enjoyment occasionally occurs. The Guanyin shouji jing says: "The lifespan of Amitābha Buddha is immeasurable hundreds of thousands of koṭis of kalpas, but it will have an end. After his parinirvāṇa, when the dawn appears, Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva will achieve equal and perfect enlightenment under a bodhi tree of seven jewels, named Universal Light Mountain of Merit King Buddha; his land will be named Adornment of the Universal Collection of All Jewels, surpassing Amitābha Buddha's land by hundreds of thousands of koṭis of times, beyond comparison. When this Buddha passes away, Mahāsthāmaprāpta will become a Buddha, named Good Abode Jewel of Merit King Buddha." Because the capacities of the ten grounds had already been thoroughly matured beforehand, they transformed that kind [of being] and achieved Buddhahood in that very body. It does not mention where or in what heaven he previously resided and later succeeded to the position; he simply took the seat and achieved Buddhahood in that very body. This is the mark of achieving Buddhahood produced by generating causes perfumed by the great compassion of other-enjoyment. Therefore, equality wisdom, from the first ground onward, can manifest in accordance with what sentient beings delight in; perfumed and steeped by great compassion before the path of seeing, from the first ground onward it can manifest various bodies according to the three vehicles and according to what is suitable to be seen. The Huayan jing says: "Among the ten abodes, the abode of first generating the mind can manifest perfect enlightenment and later enter nirvāṇa." How much more so that the transformation marks would not be manifested in the ten grounds! The Lotus Sūtra and others state that Avalokiteśvara and Gadgadasvara, both through spiritual power, manifest those respective bodies and preach the Dharma for those who should be saved through the three vehicles; therefore, in the positions of the ten grounds, they can all manifest transformation bodies. These transformation bodies and other-enjoyment [bodies] are transformed by subsequent [attainment wisdom], and are fundamentally only anāsrava. Those transformed based on the categories of the five and eighth consciousnesses are all only sāsrava. They are in the same locus and resemble [each other], so to the observer they seem to be one. Up to the attainment of Buddhahood, they can manifest various transformations in accordance with what is suitable for the three vehicles in the ten directions: either manifesting a Buddha's body, or manifesting other bodies. Formerly, in the bodhisattva positions, one had to first abide in that Tuṣita heaven, and only afterward descend to be born. When attaining the position at the beginning of an [increasing] kalpa, one is born into a Brahmin family, like Maitreya and others, because they despise wealth and honour and esteem pure conduct; when in a declining kalpa, one is born into a Kṣatriya family, like Śākyamuni and others, because they despise pure conduct and esteem wealth and honour. In order to transform them, the Buddha manifests these two kinds of births. Fascicle nine of the Mahāyānasaṃgraha says: "The Buddha's transformation body can manifest eight marks: manifesting passing away from the heavenly palace, taking birth, experiencing sensual pleasures, leaving the household over the city walls, cultivating various austerities, realizing great bodhi, turning the great dharmacakra, and entering great nirvāṇa." Fascicle 568 of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra also states eight marks: first, descending from heaven, which is the mark of entering the womb; second, an infant, which is the mark of taking birth; third, a youth, which is the mark of experiencing sensual pleasures; fourth, austerities; fifth, attaining the path; sixth, subduing the demons; seventh, turning the dharmacakra; eighth, entering nirvāṇa. It does not have the mark of leaving the household found in that Mahāyānasaṃgraha, and adds the mark of subduing the demons. In the Mahāyānasaṃgraha, subduing the demons is subsumed under the mark of attaining the path; because attaining the path departs from three demons, while subduing the demons overcomes one, and also because immediately after attaining the path one subdues the demons. It first manifests leaving the household, and subsequently undertakes austerities, establishing them separately. Leaving the household in that treatise demonstrates the mark of renouncing the worldly, while austerities demonstrate the mark of cultivating wrong practices. The sūtra combines and establishes them because leaving the household is for cultivating austerities; practicing the path and realizing the fruit, and subduing the demons and removing enemies, are therefore established separately. Each is based on one perspective, and they do not contradict each other. It is as extensively explained in that sūtra, elucidating the reasons for manifesting these marks. In the Huayan jing ten marks are stated, adding two to the eight. Because the faculties of the sentient beings of the three vehicles are not yet matured, the Buddha body is manifested only after causing them to deeply yearn and delight; therefore, one first resides in heaven and then descends to be born and achieve Buddhahood, according to what all sentient beings ought to see. This is the transformation body, the mark of achieving Buddhahood produced by generating causes perfumed and steeped by great compassion. The teachings state that there are three types of bodhisattvas: first, bound to one [more] birth, such as Maitreya and others. The body previously residing among humans is called "bound to one birth." Looking toward the future Buddha position, there should be four births: the human and heavenly principal existences (mūlabhava) and the two intermediate existences (antarābhava), like seven births, etc., called one large birth. If residing in heaven, one is called "bound to one birth" because half a birth is called one, being one principal existence. The Da zhidu lun says that Maitreya has three births, speaking of them while among humans and excluding the body of achieving Buddhahood, which is why it says three. Second, the final body; third, sitting at the site of enlightenment. These two are restricted to the bodily position of achieving Buddhahood. Since the transformation body manifests the two enjoyment bodies, although no text is seen, it should be understood by analogy to this. For the self-enjoyment body, prior to the seventh ground it is called "bound to one birth," and after the eighth ground it is called the "final body," because there are no further births; residing on the lotus seat is called "sitting at the site of enlightenment." For the other-enjoyment body, the former body before Avalokiteśvara is called "bound to one birth," and the body of Avalokiteśvara is called the "final body"; residing on the seven-jewel seat is called "sitting at the site of enlightenment." The dharmakāya has no birth, so it lacks these meanings. However, these three bodies are not definitively identical or different. The self-enjoyment body is the mark of one's own body. The dharmakāya is the rational nature of this body; principle and wisdom are profound and subtle, not known to others. When the three vehicles see it coarsely, it is designated as transformation; when the ten grounds see it subtly, it is called the other-enjoyment body. Due to differing perceptions, their natures and marks are distinct. The aggregation of virtuous meanings is divided into three bodies; they are not established as three kinds like the distinct individual entities of sentient beings. Because they are not definitively different, and because they are not non-different, they are not definitively identical or different. For example, Śākyamuni Buddha: what is seen by the ten grounds is called the other-enjoyment body; what is seen by the two vehicles is called the transformation body; when non-conceptual wisdom observes his true principle, it is called the dharmakāya. The true wisdom is profound and subtle; having cultivated causes for a long time to fruition, one personally experiences the joy of the Dharma, not known to others, which is called the self-enjoyment body. Different perceptions and views are not definitively identical or different; this is the mark of the result arising from the cause, through generating and revealing causes. However, there is one result obtained by two causes: first, the generating cause; second, the drawing cause. The Cheng weishi lun says: "Generating the proximate, primary result is called the generating cause; drawing the distant, remaining result is called the drawing cause. For example, regarding the enjoyment body, the various anāsrava seeds prior to the vajropamasamādhi are distantly the drawing cause, while the seeds of its own position are proximately the generating cause. Looking toward the Buddha's dharmakāya, both the proximate and distant actualized wisdoms are drawing causes, not generating causes; because it does not say that the drawing cause and generating cause, etc., obtain detachment from bondage, but only says that the causing-to-arise cause and the determining-difference cause, etc., obtain the unconditioned. When the transformation body and the like manifest before one, the seeds are the generating cause, because they directly give rise [to it]; looking toward the relics and so forth, they are called the drawing cause, because they draw the remaining result." Now we say that the enjoyment [body] is one result with two causes; if looking toward the dharmakāya, it is one result with one cause; if looking toward the transformation body, it is one cause with two results. Furthermore, the Buddha's two results are obtained by two causes, namely the causes of principle and wisdom. The Śrīmālādevī-sūtra says: "There are two kinds of tathāgatagarbha emptiness wisdom: that which is separate, detached, severed, and different from all stores of kleśas; and the inconceivable tathāgatagarbha that is not separate, not detached, not severed, and not different."
7.11.4
」此說煩惱體能覆藏名之為藏,虛妄不實、究竟破壞故名為空。 《無垢稱》說「塵勞之疇是如來種姓。 」《涅槃經》說「未得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提時,善、不善、無記法皆名佛性,名如來藏。 」故經標言有二種如來藏空智,煩惱亦名如來藏故。 其真如理因空所顯,空之性故,名之為空。 法身之因煩惱所覆,名如來藏。 此離纏位名為法身,故斷能覆煩惱障縛,證得法身自性解脫。 《法花經》說欲示眾生佛知見故出現於世,示三乘者法身同故,滅二化城至寶所故。 十卷《楞伽》第八卷初說「阿梨耶識名空如來藏; 具足無漏熏習法故,名不空如來藏。 」彼經意說:阿賴耶識能含淨種,名之為藏。 為當佛因,名如來藏。 又未得菩提皆佛性故,名如來藏。 性虛妄故、亦破壞故,不實名空。 所含無漏淨法種子,報身因故,名如來藏。 性非虛妄,究竟不盡,名為不空。 此生現行圓滿果位名報化身,故斷能藏有漏藏識。 所知障滅大智滿故,證受用身。 大悲滿故,起變化身。 《法華經》說:欲令眾生悟佛知見,出現於世。 聲聞緣覺不知智身真實處故,不賜羊鹿但與牛車至道場故。 上來二因,若在果位名法受用,示悟此二佛出世間,欲令眾生修此二因入佛知見,皆令修行不退轉業,即是示悟入佛知見。 佛出於世,總顯經義。 佛出世間欲令眾生修二妙因得二勝果,開此無上讚歎令修,即是開、示、悟、入之義。 復有二因能得二果,如大乘經《莊嚴論》說「福德、智慧二資糧,菩薩善修無邊際,乃至勇猛疾歸德海岸。 」《攝論》亦言「誰能悟入所應知相? 善備福、智資糧。 菩薩果隨增上分為二類,法身是福、受用是智。 或受用是智、變化是福。 法身通二,理實三身皆通福、智,二實性故、二所成故、二所起故。 由此三身皆二因得。 復有二因:一能生、二方便。 能生因性即是因緣,所餘三緣方便因性,受用、變化二因所得,法身一種方便因得。 又有二因,謂共、不共。 法身一種,是共因得。 自受用身,不共因得。 他受用、變化,通共、不共。 又有二因,大智、大悲,自利、他利,隨增義說。 自受用身,大智、自利因。 他受用變化身,大悲、利他因。 法身通二因。 或皆通二,菩薩利他為自利故,菩薩自利為利他故。 又有二因:一性種姓、二習種姓。 法身非由二因親得,疎亦可名。 雖名佛性,無別類故,不名性種性,由此亦無因習成性。 餘之二身,二性親得。 又有三種因,謂聞、思、修。 修慧正為親生了因,聞思疎助。 又三智因,正智正為法身了因,餘二疎助。 正智、後得為受用正生因,加行疎助。 後智正為變化正生因,餘二疎助。 」舊說三因:一應得因,謂即真如,所應得故。 二加行因,謂菩提心願。 三果圓滿因,謂正加行。 隨增義者,初得法身; 次得化身,願利生故; 後得報身,實修行故。 《佛性論》中說此三因各感三身,通所成故,廣如彼說。 彼論又說「佛性有三:一自性住佛性,未發心前住自性位; 二引出佛性,發心以後諸有學位; 三至得果佛性,謂無學位。 」彼論多說法身理性有此三位,與涅槃同。 依受用身有為佛性分此三種,理亦無失。 又有三因,《般若經》說「發菩提心,應云何住? 云何修行? 云何降伏其心? 」無著釋言「云何住,謂欲願。 行謂無相、相應等持。 伏謂折伏散心,還住正願,入定折伏散障。 名三種因。 」天親釋同。 或異解者,發心、修行、斷障別故。 散行、定行,初心散行,次心定行,後心入聖斷障,是故三因攝一切盡。 彼經宗意,說法身因行無相故,亦說福智二相法身亦受用因,方能起化利益無盡。 有四種緣:一因緣、二等無間緣、三所緣緣、四增上緣。 因緣一種,遍諸有為,親辦自果。 等無間緣,因果必是心心所法。 其所緣緣,體通一切法,果必心心所。
… this states that the substantial nature of the kleśas can cover and conceal, hence it is called a “womb” (garbha); because it is false, unreal, and ultimately destroyed, it is called “empty.” The Vimalakīrtinirdeśa states, “The host of dust and toils are the gotra of the Tathāgata.” The Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra states, “When one has not yet attained anuttarāsamyaksaṃbodhi, good, unwholesome, and indeterminate dharmas are all called Buddha-nature, and called the tathāgatagarbha.” Thus the sūtra sets forth that there are two kinds of tathāgatagarbha: emptiness and wisdom, because kleśas are also called the tathāgatagarbha. The principle of tathatā is revealed by means of emptiness; being the nature of emptiness, it is called “empty.” The cause of the dharmakāya is covered by kleśas, hence it is called the tathāgatagarbha. When it is separated from the stage of entanglements, it is called the dharmakāya; therefore, by severing the binding hindrances of kleśas that can cover it, one realizes the dharmakāya, which is liberation by nature. The Lotus Sūtra states that [the Buddha] appears in the world because he desires to show the knowledge and vision of the Buddha to sentient beings; this is because he shows the three vehicles that their dharmakāya is identical, extinguishing the two illusory cities to arrive at the treasure storehouse. The beginning of fascicle eight of the ten-fascicle Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra states, “The ālayavijñāna is called the empty tathāgatagarbha; because it is fully endowed with anāsrava perfumed dharmas, it is called the non-empty tathāgatagarbha.” The purport of that sūtra means: the ālayavijñāna can contain pure seeds, hence it is called a “womb.” Being the future cause of Buddhahood, it is called the tathāgatagarbha. Furthermore, because before attaining bodhi all [things] are Buddha-nature, it is called the tathāgatagarbha. Because its nature is false and unreal, and also subject to destruction, its unreality is called “empty.” The seeds of anāsrava pure dharmas it contains, being the cause of the saṃbhogakāya, are called the tathāgatagarbha. Because their nature is not false and unreal, and ultimately inexhaustible, they are called “non-empty.” When this produces the actualized and fully perfected fruit, it is called the saṃbhogakāya and nirmāṇakāya; therefore, one severs the sāsrava storehouse consciousness that can store them. Because the hindrance of the knowable is destroyed and great wisdom is perfected, one realizes the saṃbhogakāya. Because great compassion is perfected, one gives rise to the nirmāṇakāya. The Lotus Sūtra states: [the Buddha] appears in the world because he desires to cause sentient beings to awaken to the knowledge and vision of the Buddha. Because śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas do not know the real abode of the wisdom body, he does not bestow sheep carts or deer carts, but only gives them ox carts to reach the place of enlightenment. The above two causes, when at the stage of fruition, are called Dharma and enjoyment. Demonstrating and awakening to these two, the Buddha appears in the world; wishing to cause sentient beings to cultivate these two causes and enter the knowledge and vision of the Buddha, he causes them all to practice the karma of non-retrogression, which is precisely opening, showing, awakening to, and entering the knowledge and vision of the Buddha. The Buddha appearing in the world generally reveals the meaning of the sūtra: the Buddha appears in the world wishing to cause sentient beings to cultivate the two wondrous causes to attain the two supreme fruits; revealing this unsurpassed [path] and praising it to cause them to cultivate it, this is precisely the meaning of opening, showing, awakening to, and entering. Furthermore, there are two causes that can obtain the two fruits, as the Mahāyāna sūtra Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra states: “The two provisions of merit and wisdom, the bodhisattva cultivates well without limit, up to courageously and swiftly returning to the shore of the ocean of virtues.” The Mahāyānasaṃgraha also says: “Who can awaken to and enter the characteristics of what ought to be known? One who has well prepared the provisions of merit and wisdom.” If the fruits of a bodhisattva are divided into two kinds according to their predominance, the dharmakāya is merit and the saṃbhoga[kāya] is wisdom. Or, the saṃbhoga[kāya] is wisdom and the nirmāṇa[kāya] is merit. The dharmakāya is common to both. In principle and fact, all three bodies are common to merit and wisdom, because they are the real nature of both, are accomplished by both, and are arisen from both. Therefore, all three bodies are obtained by the two causes. Furthermore, there are two causes: first, the producing cause; second, the expedient cause. The nature of the producing cause is the root cause (hetu-pratyaya); the remaining three conditions are the nature of the expedient cause. The saṃbhoga and nirmāṇa [bodies] are obtained by both causes; the dharmakāya alone is obtained by the expedient cause. Furthermore, there are two causes, namely shared and unshared. The dharmakāya alone is obtained by a shared cause. The self-enjoyment body is obtained by an unshared cause. The other-enjoyment and nirmāṇa [bodies] are common to both shared and unshared. Furthermore, there are two causes: great wisdom and great compassion, benefiting oneself and benefiting others, spoken according to what is predominant. The self-enjoyment body is the cause of great wisdom and benefiting oneself. The other-enjoyment and nirmāṇa bodies are the causes of great compassion and benefiting others. The dharmakāya is common to both causes. Or, all [bodies] are common to both, because a bodhisattva benefits others for the sake of benefiting oneself, and a bodhisattva benefits oneself for the sake of benefiting others. Furthermore, there are two causes: first, the lineage of nature; second, the lineage of practice. The dharmakāya is not directly obtained by the two causes, though it may be distantly called so. Although it is called Buddha-nature, because there are no distinct categories, it is not called the lineage of nature, and thereby there is also no nature formed by practice. The other two bodies are directly obtained by the two natures. Furthermore, there are three kinds of causes, namely hearing, contemplation, and cultivation. The prajñā of cultivation is strictly the direct producing and revealing cause; hearing and contemplation are distant and auxiliary. Furthermore, there are three wisdom causes: fundamental wisdom is strictly the revealing cause for the dharmakāya; the other two are distant and auxiliary. Fundamental wisdom and subsequent [wisdom] are the direct producing causes for the saṃbhoga[kāya]; preparatory [wisdom] is distant and auxiliary. Subsequent wisdom is strictly the direct producing cause for the nirmāṇa[kāya]; the other two are distant and auxiliary.” An older explanation speaks of three causes: first, the cause that should be obtained, namely tathatā, because it is what should be obtained; second, the cause of preparation, namely the aspiration and vow for bodhi; third, the cause of perfection of fruition, namely right preparation. According to what is predominant: first, one obtains the dharmakāya; next, one obtains the nirmāṇakāya, because of the vow to benefit sentient beings; finally, one obtains the saṃbhogakāya, because of true practice. In the Buddhadhātu-śāstra it is said that these three causes each bring about the three bodies, as they are commonly accomplished, as explained extensively there. That treatise also states: “There are three kinds of Buddha-nature: first, Buddha-nature abiding in its own nature, which abides in the stage of its own nature before generating the mind [for bodhi]; second, drawn-out Buddha-nature, which refers to all stages of the trainee (śaikṣa) after generating the mind; third, Buddha-nature of attaining fruition, which refers to the stage of the non-trainee (aśaikṣa).” That treatise mostly speaks of the principle-nature of the dharmakāya having these three stages, which is identical to nirvāṇa. If one divides these three kinds based on the conditioned Buddha-nature of the saṃbhogakāya, in principle there is also no error. Furthermore, there are three causes; the Prajñāpāramitā-sūtra states: “When generating the mind for bodhi, how should one abide? How should one practice? How should one subdue one's mind?” Asaṅga explains: “‘How should one abide’ refers to desire and vow. ‘Practice’ refers to signless and corresponding samādhi. ‘Subdue’ refers to subduing the distracted mind, returning to abide in the right vow, and entering concentration to subdue the hindrances of distraction. These are called the three kinds of causes.” Vasubandhu’s explanation is the same. Alternatively, in a different interpretation, this is because generating the mind, practicing, and severing hindrances are distinct. Distracted practice and concentrated practice: the initial mind is distracted practice, the next mind is concentrated practice, and the final mind enters the noble [state] and severs hindrances; therefore, the three causes encompass everything completely. The main purport of that sūtra is to speak of the practice of signlessness as the cause of the dharmakāya, and also to speak of the two marks of merit and wisdom as the dharmakāya as well as the cause of the saṃbhoga[kāya], so that one can then manifest transformations and benefit endlessly. There are four kinds of conditions: first, root condition (hetu-pratyaya); second, immediately preceding condition (samanantara-pratyaya); third, objective condition (ālambana-pratyaya); fourth, sovereign condition (adhipati-pratyaya). The one root condition pervades all conditioned dharmas and directly accomplishes its own fruit. For the immediately preceding condition, cause and fruit must be minds and mental factors. As for the objective condition, its substance pervades all dharmas, but its fruit must be minds and mental factors.
7.11.5
增上緣性,因果俱通,與力不遮果自性故。 法身但由增上緣得,自受用身通四緣得,他受用變化初、後緣得,非心心所,實自性故。 復有四力:一因、二善友、三作意、四資糧。 三身皆通四力所得。 然親得者,法身即非。 又有四行,〈菩薩地〉說:一菩提分、二波羅蜜、三諸神通、四成熟有情。 三身皆由此四行得。 又有六因:一能作、二俱有、三相應、四同類、五遍行、六異熟。 能作體通有為無為,果唯有為,不障生故,體通四緣攝。 俱有體通諸有為法,俱時與力。 因緣、增上、相應果,唯心心所法,亦因、增上。 同類唯是諸有為法,同品、勝品自類為因,亦因、增上,所緣定無,等無間不定。 遍行唯是苦、集二諦。 或是見道遍緣四諦一切煩惱,唯除因緣。 異熟唯是有漏善業及不善業,招無記故,唯增上緣。 此六因中,若諸現行望自親種,為因、增上。 現行相望定無因緣,必有增上。 餘二不定。 望不親種,但一增上。 一切種子望自類種,皆因、增上。 望自類現行,亦因、增上,定無等無間,所緣緣不定。 若望異種,但為增上。 望異現行,定為增上,無因、等無間,所緣緣不定。 初之四因通現及種,可有因緣。 遍行、異熟雖通現種,不親生故,皆非因緣。 前四因通有漏、無漏,後二種因唯是有漏。 故佛三身,法身非是六因所得,體非生故; 自受用身前四因得; 他受、變化初三因得,非相應因。 如〈六因義林〉教理為證。 復有十因:一隨說、二觀待、三牽引、四生起、五攝受、六引發、七定異、八同事、九相違、十不相違。 法身唯為五因所得,論說離繫果,攝受、引發、定異、同事、不相違因五因得故。 性妙離言,非隨說因得。 能證道合,觀待相疎,非彼因得。 牽引、生起二果有為,亦非二得。 相違因遠,得果已無,亦非彼得。 若疎遠詮,亦隨說得,不親得故,論不說之。 觀待餘二功德之身成自性身,道證非疎遠,故論亦不說。 離煩惱纏而成法身,以道證時彼都已遠,論亦不說相違因得。 然義可為八因所得,唯除牽引及生起因。 受用、變化八因所得,除隨說、相違。 言說不能親詮彼故不說得之,疎亦可得。 相違因遠不說得之,疎亦可得。 若依此義,通十因得,待因成果。 二身相待有觀待因。 能生種子,熟、未熟別,分成牽引及生起因。 攝受六依處,辨無漏法故,有攝受因。 本性種子成引發因。 自乘種子為定異因。 即前諸因同為生等一事業故,為同事因。 不相違因,其理可悉。 故有八因。 或復十因,且隨顯相說。 此因等諸嚴淨土所有妙因皆三身因,恐繁且止。
The nature of the predominant condition applies to both cause and result, because it provides efficacy and does not obstruct the intrinsic nature of the result. The dharmakāya is obtained solely through the predominant condition; the self-enjoyment body is obtained through all four conditions; the other-enjoyment [body] and the transformation [body] are obtained through the first and last conditions, because they are not minds or mental factors and are real intrinsic natures. Furthermore, there are four powers: first, cause; second, good friends; third, attention; and fourth, provisions. All three bodies are attainable through the four powers. However, in terms of directly obtaining them, the dharmakāya is not [so obtained]. There are also four practices, as stated in the 'Bodhisattvabhūmi': first, the factors of bodhi; second, the pāramitās; third, the supernormal powers; and fourth, maturing sentient beings. All three bodies are obtained by means of these four practices. Furthermore, there are six causes: first, the efficient cause; second, the co-existent cause; third, the associated cause; fourth, the similar cause; fifth, the universal cause; and sixth, the retributive cause. The substance of the efficient cause applies to both the conditioned and unconditioned, while its result is only conditioned, because it does not obstruct arising; its substance is subsumed under all four conditions. The substance of the co-existent cause applies to all conditioned phenomena, providing efficacy at the same time. The results of the cause-condition, predominant [condition], and associated [cause] are only minds and mental factors, and are also the cause[-condition] and predominant [condition]. The similar cause is only conditioned phenomena, taking its own kind as cause for the same category or superior category; it is also the cause[-condition] and predominant [condition]; the objective condition is definitely absent, while the immediately preceding condition is indefinite. The universal cause pertains only to the two truths of suffering and origination, or all kleśas of the path of seeing that universally take the four truths as object; it excludes only the cause-condition. The retributive cause is only sāsrava wholesome karma and unwholesome karma, because it produces the neutral; it is only the predominant condition. Among these six causes, if active phenomena are viewed in relation to their own direct seeds, they are cause[-conditions] and predominant [conditions]. Active phenomena viewed in relation to one another definitely lack the cause-condition, but necessarily have the predominant [condition]; the other two are indefinite. In relation to indirect seeds, there is only the predominant [condition]. All seeds in relation to seeds of their own category are both cause[-conditions] and predominant [conditions]. In relation to active phenomena of their own category, they are also cause[-conditions] and predominant [conditions]; they definitely lack the immediately preceding condition, and the objective condition is indefinite. If viewed in relation to different seeds, they are merely predominant [conditions]. In relation to different active phenomena, they are definitely predominant [conditions], lacking the cause[-condition] and immediately preceding condition, with the objective condition being indefinite. The first four causes apply to active phenomena and seeds, and can possess the cause-condition. Although the universal and retributive [causes] apply to active phenomena and seeds, they are not cause-conditions because they do not directly generate. The former four causes apply to the sāsrava and anāsrava; the latter two causes are only sāsrava. Therefore, among the three bodies of a Buddha, the dharmakāya is not obtained through the six causes, because its substance is not produced; the self-enjoyment body is obtained through the first four causes; the other-enjoyment and transformation [bodies] are obtained through the first three causes, not the associated cause. This is proven by the teachings and reasoning in the 'Chapter on the Forest of Meanings of the Six Causes'. Furthermore, there are ten causes: first, conventional expression; second, dependence; third, traction; fourth, origination; fifth, acceptance; sixth, induction; seventh, differentiation; eighth, co-operation; ninth, opposition; and tenth, non-opposition. The dharmakāya is obtained through only five causes, as the treatise states that the result of disconnection is obtained through five causes: acceptance, induction, differentiation, co-operation, and non-opposition. Because its nature is subtle and free from words, it is not obtained through the cause of conventional expression. As the path capable of realization conforms [with it], the aspect of dependence is distant, so it is not obtained through that cause. Because the two results of traction and origination are conditioned, it is also not obtained through these two. Because the cause of opposition is distant and is already absent when the result is obtained, it is also not obtained through that. If it is a distant expression, it is also obtained through conventional expression; but because it is not directly obtained, the treatise does not mention it. With respect to the other two bodies of merit forming the intrinsic-nature body in dependence [on them], the path's realization is not distant, so the treatise does not mention it either. Becoming the dharmakāya by being disconnected from the bondage of kleśas: when realized through the path, those [kleśas] are already entirely distant, so the treatise does not say it is obtained through the cause of opposition. However, in terms of meaning, it can be obtained through eight causes, excluding only the causes of traction and origination. The enjoyment and transformation [bodies] are obtained through eight causes, excluding conventional expression and opposition. Because verbal expression cannot directly designate them, they are not said to be obtained [through it], but distantly they can be obtained. Because the cause of opposition is distant, it is not said to be obtained [through it], but distantly it can be obtained. If based on this meaning, they are obtained through all ten causes, as results are achieved in dependence on causes. The two bodies mutually dependent possess the cause of dependence. The seeds capable of generating, distinguished by mature and immature, are divided into the causes of traction and origination. Because they accept the six bases and analyze anāsrava phenomena, there is the cause of acceptance. Primordial seeds become the cause of induction. Seeds of one's own vehicle are the cause of differentiation. Because the aforementioned causes share the single function of generation and so forth, they are the cause of co-operation. The cause of non-opposition can be understood by its principle. Thus there are eight causes. Or again, ten causes: these are explained according to apparent characteristics for the time being. These causes, as well as all the wondrous causes for purifying the Buddha lands, are all causes of the three bodies; fearing verbosity, I shall pause for now.
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation