[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘法苑義林章](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1861) › 7.12 # 大乘法苑義林章 7.12 大乘法苑義林章 7.12 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1861.7.12) 已辨因起，當辨果相。果有五種：一異熟、二等流、三離繫、四士用、五增上。此中士用，略有二釋。一云：五蘊假者名曰士夫，彼所得果名士用果。二云：諸別別法亦名士夫，如彼假者有體用故，從喻為名。假士夫得，名士用果。若依初義，法身唯是離繫、增上果，斷障得故是離繫果，增上可知。非有漏故非異熟果，非有為故非等流果，非五蘊假者之所親證故非士用果。若依後義亦士用果，聖道士夫之所得故。體成三果，受用、變化各成三果。非有漏故非異熟果，非無為故非離繫果。依前諸因得三身中，因緣生者等流、增上，或是士用或非土用。增上緣得，可通四果，唯除異熟，佛果無故。餘二緣得，定有增上，必無離繫，等流、士用或有或無。自類勝品者有等流，餘相望非有。彼勢力得者有士夫，餘相望非有。 > Having analyzed the arising of causes, we should now analyze the characteristics of results. There are five kinds of results: first, retributive; second, causally continuous; third, disconnection; fourth, anthropomorphic; and fifth, predominant. Here, anthropomorphic has briefly two explanations. One says: the nominal person of the five aggregates is called an 'anthropomorphic agent' (puruṣa), and the result obtained by him is called the anthropomorphic result. The other says: distinct phenomena are also called 'anthropomorphic agents'; because they possess substance and function like that nominal agent, they are named from the metaphor. Being obtained by a nominal agent is called an anthropomorphic result. If based on the first explanation, the dharmakāya is only a result of disconnection and a predominant result; being obtained by severing hindrances, it is a result of disconnection, and \[its being\] predominant can be understood. Because it is not sāsrava, it is not a retributive result; because it is not conditioned, it is not a causally continuous result; and because it is not directly realized by the nominal agent of the five aggregates, it is not an anthropomorphic result. If based on the latter explanation, it is also an anthropomorphic result, because it is obtained by the anthropomorphic agent of the noble path. Its substance constitutes three results, while the enjoyment and transformation \[bodies\] each constitute three results. Because they are not sāsrava, they are not retributive results; because they are not unconditioned, they are not results of disconnection. Among the three bodies obtained based on the aforementioned causes, that which is produced by the cause-condition is causally continuous and predominant, or is anthropomorphic or not anthropomorphic. That obtained through the predominant condition can apply to four results, excluding only retributive, because it is absent in the Buddha fruit. That obtained through the other two conditions definitely has the predominant, necessarily lacks disconnection, and may or may not have causally continuous and anthropomorphic. That which is of the same category and superior has causally continuous; viewed in relation to the rest, it does not. That obtained by the force of that has anthropomorphic; viewed in relation to the rest, it does not. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.11.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1861.7.11.5) - [Next: 7.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1861.7.13) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1861.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1861~en-mt.7.12) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1861.7.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1861.7.12) · Pramāṇa