<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1866.4.9 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [華嚴一乘教義分齊章](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1866) › 4.9

# 華嚴一乘教義分齊章 4.9

華嚴一乘教義分齊章 4.9

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1866.4.9)

遍計所執者，問：「遍計是有耶？」答：「不也，理無故。」問：「是無耶？」答：「不也，情有故。」問：「亦有亦無耶？」答：「不也，無二性故。」問：「非有非無耶？」答：「不也，所執性故。」又問：「有耶？」答：「不也，無道理故。」問：「無耶？」答：「不也，無道理故。」餘句準知。又問：「有耶？」「不也，執有故。」又問：「無耶？」「不也，執有故。」又「亦有亦無耶？」「不也，執有故。」又「非有非無耶？」「不也，執成故。」又「有耶？」「不也，由無相故。」又「無耶？」「不也，無相觀境故。」餘句準之。又「有耶？」「不也，無體故。」又「無耶？」「不也，能曀真故。」餘句準之。

> Regarding the imagined \[nature\]: Question: "Is the imagined existent?" Answer: "No, because it does not exist in principle." Question: "Is it nonexistent?" Answer: "No, because it exists in subjective sentiment." Question: "Is it both existent and nonexistent?" Answer: "No, because it lacks a dual nature." Question: "Is it neither existent nor nonexistent?" Answer: "No, because it is the nature of what is grasped." Again, question: "Is it existent?" Answer: "No, because it lacks reason." Question: "Is it nonexistent?" Answer: "No, because it lacks reason." The remaining phrases are to be understood by analogy. Again, question: "Is it existent?" "No, because it is clung to as existent." Again, question: "Is it nonexistent?" "No, because it is clung to as existent." Again: "Is it both existent and nonexistent?" "No, because it is clung to as existent." Again: "Is it neither existent nor nonexistent?" "No, because it is constituted by clinging." Again: "Is it existent?" "No, because it is markless." Again: "Is it nonexistent?" "No, because it is the cognitive object of markless contemplation." The remaining phrases correspond to this. Again: "Is it existent?" "No, because it has no substance." Again: "Is it nonexistent?" "No, because it can obscure the true." The remaining phrases correspond to this.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1866.4.8)
- [Next: 4.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1866.4.10)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1866.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1866~en-mt.4.9) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1866.4.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1866.4.9) · Pramāṇa
