<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1878.1.63 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [華嚴發菩提心章](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1878) › 1.63

# 華嚴發菩提心章 1.63

華嚴發菩提心章 1.63

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1878.1.63)

「就法四句者：若色不即空，亦有二失：一、壞俗諦過，以色不無性，則待緣不得有故。二、壞真諦過，以不會色歸空，則無真空故。若空不即色，亦有二失：一、壞真諦過，以色外斷空，理非真故。二、壞俗諦過，以空非色妄，無依故。

> "Regarding the four propositions on dharmas: If form is not identical with emptiness, there are likewise two faults: First, the fault of destroying conventional truth, because if form does not lack intrinsic nature, it could not exist dependent on conditions. Second, the fault of destroying ultimate truth, because if one does not integrate form into emptiness, there would be no true emptiness. If emptiness is not identical with form, there are likewise two faults: First, the fault of destroying ultimate truth, because nihilistic emptiness outside of form is a principle that is not real. Second, the fault of destroying conventional truth, because if emptiness is not illusory form, \[form\] would have nothing to rely upon.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1878.1.62)
- [Next: 1.64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1878.1.64)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1878.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1878~en-mt.1.63) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1878.1.63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1878.1.63) · Pramāṇa
