[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [華嚴法界玄鏡](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1883) › 1.39 # 華嚴法界玄鏡 1.39 華嚴法界玄鏡 1.39 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1883.1.39) 釋曰：此門亦二：先釋第四、後結例諸法。今初亦三：初標、二釋。言以是法無我理等者，出所以也。無我即空，以是法空即法無我，故空是色。三、是故空即是色者，結此門也。二如空色下，結，例舉上四門。空即是色，則例此空，是一切法，況不是十對所依耶？ > Commentary: This gate also has two parts: first, explaining the fourth \[phrase\]; second, concluding by analogizing to all phenomena. The first part also has three: first, stating \[the proposition\]; second, explaining it. The words "Because it is the principle of dharmas being without self," and so forth, state the reason. Selflessness is emptiness; because this emptiness of dharmas is the selflessness of dharmas, emptiness is form. Third, "Therefore emptiness is form" concludes this gate. Second, from "Just as emptiness and form are thus" downward, it concludes by raising the four gates above as an analogy. If emptiness is form, then analogizing from this, emptiness is all phenomena; how much more so is it not that which is relied upon in the ten pairs? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.38](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1883.1.38) - [Next: 1.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1883.1.40) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1883.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1883~en-mt.1.39) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1883.1.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1883.1.39) · Pramāṇa