[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [註華嚴法界觀門](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1884) › 1.233 # 註華嚴法界觀門 1.233 註華嚴法界觀門 1.233 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.233](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1884.1.233) 即前總標多事無礙故也。此就事者，前問所無，海波喻有；今影出之。若問者應云：一塵全遍理時，一切事亦全遍否？若遍則有重重之失，若不遍則多事不如理也。 > This is what was generally signalled above as "manifold phenomena are unobstructed." This treatment in terms of phenomena was not in the previous question, but was present in the ocean-and-waves analogy; here it is brought out implicitly. If one were to formulate it as a question, it would say: When a single speck of dust completely encompasses principle, do all phenomena also completely encompass it? If they do, there is the fault of infinite redundancy; if they do not, manifold phenomena do not conform to principle. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.232](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1884.1.232) - [Next: 1.234](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1884.1.234) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1884.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1884~en-mt.1.233) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1884.1.233](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1884.1.233) · Pramāṇa