<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1896.1.77 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [釋門歸敬儀](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1896) › 1.77

# 釋門歸敬儀 1.77

釋門歸敬儀 1.77

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1896.1.77)

《經》云：「汝等晝則勤心，修習善法，無令失時；初夜、後夜亦莫有廢（此謂晝夜一心常行道觀，撿據身心，無人無法故也）；中夜誦經，以自消息（此謂日夜剋心，惑致昏昧，故以言誦經，用散情意）。」以此文證，通日連夜，安有閑時？然自末代下凡，煩惱濁重，約令恒作，退住俗流。或竊服疑陽，因修歲月，寄心無地，投形無所，連日通夜，一敬不行，任業流溺，知何不起？故設六時，以接愚惑，微得漸集，猶勝沈昏。後漸明閑，連時接運，猶謂為好，好故須除。凡夫起行，各有異倫，曾習便欣，未行便捨，致有去取，眾務紛然。竊聞泥洹法域，入有多門，萬行雖殊，宗歸捨著。但以罪業違理，一向不行；福業順生，觀時修捨；出世道業，由來未經，故須專志，不容寧捨。經雖廣說，不出此三，約理求文，斯皆統攝。

> A sūtra states: 'During the day, you should diligently cultivate good dharmas without letting the time be lost; do not neglect it during the initial watch and the final watch of the night either (this refers to day and night constantly practicing the contemplation of the Way with one mind, restraining body and mind, because there is neither person nor dharma); during the middle watch, recite sūtras to rest and soothe yourselves (this means that exerting one's mind day and night may lead to drowsiness and dullness, so one uses vocal recitation of sūtras to disperse emotional distraction).' According to this textual evidence, day running into night, how could there be leisure time? However, ordinary mortals of the degenerate age have turbid and heavy afflictions; if commanded to practice constantly, they retreat to dwell in the worldly flow. Or they steal robes under false pretenses, spending years in cultivation, yet with nowhere to lodge their minds and nowhere to throw their bodies; for days and nights on end, they do not perform a single act of reverence, letting karma drift and drown—how could they rise? Therefore, the six periods were established to receive the foolish and confused; gathering merit slightly and gradually is still better than sinking into stupor. Later, as they gradually become clear and skilled, connecting the periods and carrying them continuously, they still consider it good; because they hold it as good, it must be eliminated. When ordinary people generate practice, each belongs to a different class: what they have practiced before they delight in, and what they have not practiced they abandon, leading to taking and rejecting, with all kinds of activities in confusion. I have heard that there are many gates to enter the Dharma realm of nirvāṇa; though the ten thousand practices differ, their essential source returns to abandoning attachment. Because sinful karma contradicts principle, it is avoided entirely; meritorious karma accords with life, so one cultivates or relinquishes it in accordance with the time; supramundane karma of the Way has never been traversed, so one must be single-minded and must not easily abandon it. Though sūtras explain them broadly, they do not go beyond these three; seeking the texts according to principle, these completely subsume them all.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.76](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1896.1.76)
- [Next: 1.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1896.1.78)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1896.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1896~en-mt.1.77) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1896.1.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1896.1.77) · Pramāṇa
