[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [摩訶止觀](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911) › 3.14 # 摩訶止觀 3.14 摩訶止觀 3.14 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.3.14) 若止息止從所破得名者，照境為正，除惑為傍，既從所離得名，名從傍立，即墮他性。若停止止從能破得名，照境為正，除惑為傍，既言能照，名從智生，即墮自性。若非妄想息故止、非住理故止，智斷因緣故止，名從合生，即墮共性。若非所破、非能破而言止者，此墮無因性。 > If cessation-calming receives its name from that which is destroyed, illuminating the object is primary while removing delusion is secondary; since it receives its name from that which is abandoned, the name is established from the secondary, falling into other-nature (parabhāva). If resting-calming receives its name from that which is able to destroy, illuminating the object is primary while removing delusion is secondary; since it speaks of being able to illuminate, the name arises from wisdom, falling into self-nature (svabhāva). If it is not calming because delusive conceptualizations cease, nor calming because of abiding in the principle, but calming due to the causal condition of wisdom and severance, the name arises from their combination, falling into shared nature. If one speaks of calming as neither that which is destroyed nor that which is able to destroy, this falls into causeless nature. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.3.13) - [Next: 3.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.3.15) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911~en-mt.3.14) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.3.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.3.14) · Pramāṇa