[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [摩訶止觀](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911) › 4.10 # 摩訶止觀 4.10 摩訶止觀 4.10 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [4.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.4.10) 列名者，經論出處甚多，且依《釋論》。有十種戒，所謂不缺、不破、不穿、不雜、隨道、無著、智所讚、自在、隨定、具足。此十通用性戒為根本。《大論》云：「性戒者，是尸羅。身口等八種，謂身三、口四，更加不飲酒，是淨命防意地。」又云：「十善是尸羅。佛不出世世常有之，故名『舊戒』。」佛不出世，凡夫亦修八禪，故名「舊定」。外道邪見，六十二等舊醫乳藥，名為「舊慧」。常途云：「無客定，無漏導八禪耳。」今難此語，亦應無漏導十善也。戒、慧既有客法，定何獨無？ > Regarding the listing of names, their sources in the sūtras and treatises are very numerous, but for now we rely on the Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa. There are ten kinds of precepts, namely: unblemished, unbroken, unpierced, unmixed, following the way, unattached, praised by the wise, autonomous, following concentration, and complete. These ten all take natural morality (prakṛti-śīla) as their root. The Da zhidu lun says: 'Natural morality is śīla. The eight kinds pertaining to body and speech refer to the three of the body and four of speech, with the addition of abstaining from intoxicating liquor; this is pure livelihood that guards the ground of intention.' It also says: 'The ten good paths of action are śīla. Even when no Buddha appears in the world, the world constantly has them; hence they are called "ancient precepts".' When no Buddha appears in the world, ordinary persons also cultivate the eight dhyānas; hence they are called 'ancient concentration'. The heterodox views of the tīrthikas, such as the sixty-two \[views\], like the milk medicine of the old physician, are called 'ancient wisdom'. The conventional view holds: 'There is no adventitious concentration; the undefiled merely guides the eight dhyānas.' Now I challenge this statement: then the undefiled should also merely guide the ten good paths of action! Since precepts and wisdom have adventitious phenomena, why should concentration alone lack them? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 4.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.4.9) - [Next: 4.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.4.11) - [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.4) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911~en-mt.4.10) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.4.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.4.10) · Pramāṇa