<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.5.248 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [摩訶止觀](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911) › 5.248

# 摩訶止觀 5.248

摩訶止觀 5.248

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [5.248](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.5.248)

總破者，如《大品》云：「識無生尚不可得，何況識生？」又「識生尚不可得，何況識無生？」生與無生俱不可得。《楞伽經》中又廣破無生見。然無生之理非識所知，云何謂情？捨有緣無，如步屈蟲，又似獼猴。不應虛妄執此見著。是為總破。

> As for the general refutation, as the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra states: 'The non-arising of consciousness cannot even be found, how much less the arising of consciousness?' And: 'The arising of consciousness cannot even be found, how much less the non-arising of consciousness?' Both arising and non-arising are unobtainable. The Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra also extensively refutes the view of non-arising. Moreover, the principle of non-arising is not something known by consciousness; how could it be conceptualized by delusion? Abandoning existence to condition nonexistence is like an inchworm, or like a monkey. One should not falsely cling to this view. This is the general refutation.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 5.247](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.5.247)
- [Next: 5.249](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.5.249)
- [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.5)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911~en-mt.5.248) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.5.248](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1911.5.248) · Pramāṇa
