[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [十不二門指要鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928) › 2.10 # 十不二門指要鈔 2.10 十不二門指要鈔 2.10 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.10) 二、在性下，明互具者，相成之義雖顯，恐謂修從顯發方有、性德稍異修成，故今全指修成本來已具。如《止觀》廣辨三千之相，雖是逆順二修，全為顯於性具，則全修成性也。又一一行業因果自他，雖假修成，全是性德三千顯現，故云全性成修也。又雖全性起修，而未嘗少虧性德，以常不改故，故云性無所移。雖全修成性，而未始暫闕修德，以常變造故，故云修常宛爾。然若知修性各論三千，則諸義皆顯，故荊谿云，諸家不明修性，蓋不如此明也。 > Second, from "Existing in nature..." downward explains mutual inherence. Although the meaning of mutual accomplishment is clear, it is feared people might think cultivation exists only after being revealed and arisen, and that the virtues of nature differ slightly from what is accomplished by cultivation. Therefore, it now points to what is accomplished by cultivation as being already originally inherent in its entirety. As Mohe zhiguan broadly distinguishes the marks of the three thousand realms: although these are the two cultivations of adverse and aligned, they serve entirely to reveal what is inherent in nature; thus, the entirety of cultivation constitutes nature. Moreover, every single action, cause, effect, self, and other, although accomplished through cultivation, is entirely the manifestation of the three thousand virtues of nature; therefore it says, "Nature in its entirety constitutes cultivation." Furthermore, although cultivation arises entirely from nature, it never diminishes the virtues of nature in the least because nature is permanently unalterable; therefore it says, "Nature has no displacement." Although the entirety of cultivation constitutes nature, it has never for a moment lacked the virtues of cultivation because it is constantly transforming and creating; therefore it says, "Cultivation is ever distinct." If one knows that cultivation and nature each discuss the three thousand realms, then all meanings become clear. Hence Jingxi said that the various masters did not understand cultivation and nature because they did not understand it in this way. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.9) - [Next: 2.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.11) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928~en-mt.2.10) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.10) · Pramāṇa