[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [十不二門指要鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928) › 2.16 # 十不二門指要鈔 2.16 十不二門指要鈔 2.16 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.16) 問：「他云，舊本作此其字，釋意云，豈可由不移生死涅槃常殊之性事，便任此為了修乎？是故下句便云，故須一其迷了照性成修。此復云何？」 > Question: "Others say that older editions have the characters 'this' (ci 此) and 'its' (qi 其), explaining the meaning as: 'How could one, because the unchanging nature and phenomena of saṃsāra and nirvāṇa are constantly distinct, casually take this as understanding-cultivation?' Therefore the following line says: 'Therefore one must take this/its (ci/qi) delusion and understanding, illuminating nature to accomplish cultivation.' How should this be resolved?" > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.15) - [Next: 2.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.17) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928~en-mt.2.16) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.16) · Pramāṇa