<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.23 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [十不二門指要鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928) › 2.23

# 十不二門指要鈔 2.23

十不二門指要鈔 2.23

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.23)

問：「修二性一已同波水，修尚即性，豈修中二法更須約諭融之耶？」

> Question: "The two of cultivation and the one of nature are already identical to waves and water, and cultivation is moreover identical to nature. Why would the two dharmas within cultivation further require an analogy to harmonize them?"  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.22](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.22)
- [Next: 2.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.24)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928~en-mt.2.23) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.23) · Pramāṇa
