[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [十不二門指要鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928) › 2.27 # 十不二門指要鈔 2.27 十不二門指要鈔 2.27 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.27) 答：「本具妙理若定是三，不能作一及無量故，故知立則一多宛然，亡則修性寂矣。今就亡說，豈得將立以難之！」 > Answer: "If the originally inherent wondrous principle were definitively three, it could not make one or the immeasurable. Hence one knows that when established, the one and the many are clearly apparent, but when extinguished, cultivation and nature are quiescent. Now it is spoken in terms of extinction; how could one use establishment to raise an objection against it!" > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.26) - [Next: 2.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.28) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928~en-mt.2.27) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1928.2.27) · Pramāṇa