[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四明尊者教行錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937) › 3.10 # 四明尊者教行錄 3.10 四明尊者教行錄 3.10 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.10) 一問：藏疏既云：唯識宗齊於業相以為諸法生起之本，故彼真如不說隨緣。荊溪既立別教真如在迷能生九界，則以真如為生法本，乃永異業相為生法本，安云別理不隨緣耶？ > Question 1: Fazang's commentary already says: 'The Consciousness-Only school reaches only as far as the karmic mark as the origin of the arising of all dharmas; therefore its suchness does not speak of following conditions.' Since Jingxi established that suchness in the separate teaching can produce the nine realms when in delusion, it takes suchness as the origin for producing dharmas, which is eternally distinct from taking the karmic mark as the origin for producing dharmas—how can you say the separate principle does not follow conditions? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.9) - [Next: 3.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.11) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937~en-mt.3.10) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.10) · Pramāṇa