[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四明尊者教行錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937) › 3.12 # 四明尊者教行錄 3.12 四明尊者教行錄 3.12 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.12) 三問：藏疏既云：唯識宗但說八識生滅，縱轉成四智，亦唯是有為，不得即理。荊溪既立別理名為佛性，豈是轉八識成四智耶？別理既是佛性，即隨淨緣成於果佛。那云不隨緣耶？ > Question 3: Fazang's commentary already says: 'The Consciousness-Only school only speaks of the arising and perishing of the eight consciousnesses, which, even when transformed into the four wisdoms, are solely conditioned and cannot be identical to principle.' Since Jingxi established that the separate principle is called buddha-nature, is it merely transforming the eight consciousnesses into the four wisdoms? Since the separate principle is buddha-nature, it follows pure conditions to become the fruitional buddha. How can you say it does not follow conditions? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.11) - [Next: 3.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.13) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937~en-mt.3.12) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.12) · Pramāṇa