[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四明尊者教行錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937) › 3.14 # 四明尊者教行錄 3.14 四明尊者教行錄 3.14 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.14) 五問：藏疏圓教既未談理性本具諸法，與今家圓教得泯齊否？彼圓望今圓尚自天殊，安將終教之理與今圓等？ > Question 5: Since the perfect teaching in Fazang's commentary does not speak of the nature of principle inherently possessing all dharmas, can it be completely equal to our school's perfect teaching? When his perfect teaching is compared to our present perfect teaching, they are already as different as heaven and earth; how can you equate the principle of his final teaching with our present perfect teaching? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.13) - [Next: 3.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.15) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937~en-mt.3.14) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.14) · Pramāṇa