[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四明尊者教行錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937) › 3.15 # 四明尊者教行錄 3.15 四明尊者教行錄 3.15 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.15) 六問：藏疏不談理具諸法，為知而不談？為不知耶？若知而不談者，則有隱覆深義之過。若元不知者，則不善談圓，安得與今圓同？彼圓尚不同今圓，況終教耶？ > Question 6: In Fazang's commentary not speaking of the theoretical possession of all dharmas, was it because he knew it but did not speak of it, or because he did not know it? If he knew it but did not speak of it, he would have the fault of concealing profound meanings. If he fundamentally did not know it, then he was not adept at discussing the perfect teaching; how could it be the same as our present perfect teaching? If his perfect teaching is not yet the same as our present perfect teaching, how much less so his final teaching? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.14) - [Next: 3.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.16) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937~en-mt.3.15) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.15) · Pramāṇa