[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四明尊者教行錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937) › 3.16 # 四明尊者教行錄 3.16 四明尊者教行錄 3.16 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.16) 七問：藏疏既未談理具諸法，是則一理隨緣變作諸法，則非無作。若不成無作，何得同今圓耶？ > Question 7: Since Fazang's commentary does not speak of the theoretical possession of all dharmas, this means that a single principle follows conditions to transform and create all dharmas, which is not unconditioned/non-contrived. If it does not constitute non-contrivance, how can it be identical to our present perfect teaching? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.15) - [Next: 3.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.17) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937~en-mt.3.16) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.16) · Pramāṇa