[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [四明尊者教行錄](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937) › 3.20 # 四明尊者教行錄 3.20 四明尊者教行錄 3.20 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.20) 十一問：藏疏明判賴耶為生法之本故名分教，則顯真如為生法本乃名終教。子今既信別理無住能造諸法，若不隨緣，安能造法耶？ > The eleventh query: Fazang's commentary clearly determines that ālayavijñāna is the root of arising dharmas, hence calling it the differentiated teaching, whereas revealing that true thusness is the root of arising dharmas is called the final teaching. If you now already believe that the principle of the separate \[teaching\] is non-abiding and able to create the myriad dharmas, if it does not accord with conditions, how could it create dharmas? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.19) - [Next: 3.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.21) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937~en-mt.3.20) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1937.3.20) · Pramāṇa